IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI, JJ.
Bharti Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Bhardwaj – Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.). No. 18 of 2021
Decided On : 03-02-2021
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT - DIVORCE - 13(1)(ia) - 24
Fact of the Case:
The case involved an appeal under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging a divorce petition granted to the respondent/husband on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the HMA. The appellant/wife opposed the divorce petition and alleged ill-treatment and torture by the respondent and his family members.
Finding of the Court:
The Family Court accepted the unrebutted testimony of the respondent and granted a decree of divorce in his favor, holding that the appellant had treated him with cruelty. The Court also held that the appellant's act of lodging false complaints against the respondent and his family under the DV Act amounted to mental cruelty.
Issues: The primary issue was whether the appellant had inflicted cruelty upon the respondent, and whether the respondent's allegations of cruelty were adequately challenged by the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the importance of cross-examination in establishing one's case in matrimonial disputes. It held that the failure of the appellant to effectively cross-examine the respondent and her admission of lodging false complaints constituted mental cruelty. The Court also cited the standard of proof in matrimonial proceedings, which is based on preponderance of probabilities.
Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of, upholding the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court.
JUDGMENT :
REKHA PALLI, J.
C.M.No.3968/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
C.M.No.3969/2021 (condonation of delay in refiling)
1. This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in refiling the present petition.
2. Keeping in view that the accompanying petition was filed within the period of limitation, the delay in re-filing which took place mainly during the period when the regular functioning of the Court stood suspended, we are inclined to accept the explanation given in the application and proceed to deal with the appeal on merits.
3. The application is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 18/2021
4. The present appeal under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “HMA”) assails the judgement dated 21.11.2019 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Courts, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in HMA NO. 1069/19/11, allowing the divorce petition preferred by the respondent/husband on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the HMA. The impugned judgment also disposed of the appellant/wife’s application under Section 24 of the HMA by holding that since she had already been awarded maintenance under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, she was not entitled to any further maintenance which she sought under Section 24 of the HMA because both of these proceedings were parallel in nature.
5. The facts in brief are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 07.02.2010 in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies; they had a daughter out of the wedlock on 30.12.2010. The parties have, however, been residing separately since 28.11.2011. A few weeks later, on 17.12.2011, the respondent preferred a petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the HMA seeking dissolution of the marriage on the grounds of cruelty. The case of the respondent before the Family Court was that notwithstanding the cordial manner in which she was received by his family and all his efforts to maintain congeniality in their marriage, his wife/the appellant treated his family and him with cruelty and cold insolence. The divorce petition contained detailed descriptions of the various instances of cruelty alleged by him, which involved the appellant humiliating him and his family. He claimed that the appellant, who was arrogant, finicky and failed to take any initiative in adapting to the matrimonial house, used to force him to take her to her parental home very frequently. The respondent further claimed that the appellant was compelling him to leave his family home, his family and reside with her in an accommodation near her parents’ house. He claimed that when he failed to abide by this demand of hers, the appellant not only picked a fight with him, but she also left the matrimonial home on 28.11.2011 with their minor child, while threatening to implicate him and his family in false cases.
6. The appellant filed her written petition, opposing the divorce petition and alleging that she was the one who had been ill-treated and tortured by the respondent and his family members, who had created such a toxic environment for her, that she ultimately decided to leave their house. She claimed that the respondent’s family were enraged with her for bringing insufficient dowry and often expressed this, they also ostracised her and would not allow her to enter the kitchen or share in household chores. This behaviour compelled her to file complaints against the respondent and his family before the DCP (Women Cell) of the Delhi Police, Kirti Nagar, which complaint is presently under investigation.
7. Before the learned Family Court, the respondent, in support of his allegations, filed his evidence by way of affidavit which set out the date, time and description of all the incidents displaying cruelty on the appellant’s part, including the manner in which he and his family were taunted and humiliated by her.
The importance of cross-examination in establishing one's case in matrimonial disputes and the standard of proof based on preponderance of probabilities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that mental cruelty in matrimonial matters must be of such a nature that the parties cannot reasonably be expected to live together, and the intent....
Mental cruelty can be a ground for divorce and includes verbal abuses and insults that cause mental pain and suffering. The court must consider the conduct of the parties, the effect on the mind of t....
Cruelty in marriage requires substantial proof of grave conduct; mere quarrels and allegations do not suffice to dissolve marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that to prove cruelty for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, instances of cruelty must be established with specific reference to date, time, pla....
Section 146 of Evidence Act, which permits a witness to be questioned, inter-alia, in order to test his veracity.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the marriage bond can be considered broken irretrievably due to mental cruelty, loss of mutual trust and faith, and the refusal to share the b....
False allegations made in legal proceedings can constitute mental cruelty, warranting divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.