VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Shri Chand Construction and Apartment Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Nikhil Agarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jasmeet Singh, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD (hereinafter referred to as “appellant”), being aggrieved by the order dated 04.03.2020 passed in IA No. 11823/2019 in CS(OS) No. 179/2019 titled SHRI CHAND CONSTRUCTION & APARTMENT PVT. LTD. VERSUS TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD. Vide said order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the application filed by the defendant/appellant in the suit, under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. Briefly stating the facts in the present appeal as under:
3. The respondent filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 3,40,00,000/- against the appellant with interest @ 18% per annum pendente lite and future interest on account of loss of the security documents in the form of original title documents (which had been kept by the respondent with the appellant) of the immovable property mortgaged with the appellant vide loan account no. 9921466 & 9904086. The respondent has cleared the loan in question and nothing remained due or recoverable by the appellant against the r
Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. T. Thankam
Magma Leasing & Finance Ltd. v. Potluri Madhavilata
M.D. Frozen Foods Exports (P) Ltd. v. Hero Fincorp Ltd.
Zhejiang Bonly Elevator Guide Rail Manufacture Co. Ltd. v. Jade Elevator Components
P. Anand Gajapathi Raju v. P.V.G. Raju
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums
Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar
Appellant is within the purview of the SARFAESI Act even though it was not on the date of entering into the agreement containing the arbitration clause.
The court upheld the validity of arbitration clauses in financial agreements, ruling that disputes arising under such agreements must be resolved via arbitration, even amidst ongoing SARFAESI Act pro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the claims of banks and financial institutions under the RDDB Act are non-arbitrable, and the disputes regarding determination of debt due fel....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the borrower's invocation of arbitration was without jurisdiction, and the resulting arbitration proceedings and award were invalid.
Disputes covered by special laws, creating special rights to be adjudicated and enforced by special forums, are non-arbitrable.
Arbitration disputes can persist even after prior adjudication and under SARFAESI Act, respecting parties' choices for resolution.
SARFAESI Act was enacted to regulate securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest and for matters connected therewith. Liquidation of secured interest th....
Section 11 SARFAESI mandates arbitration for disputes between bank and financial institution over non-payment due including interest in loan takeover, even if one not secured creditor, as triggered b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.