Back
YASHWANT VARMA
Fermina Developers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions filed under section 9 of the arbitration act. (Para 1) |
| 2. common facts in the petitions used for brevity. (Para 2) |
| 3. loan history and securities documented in loan agreements. (Para 3) |
| 4. ots terms and payments made before recalls claimed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. notices issued is a significant procedural step. (Para 6) |
| 6. arguments on maintainability and default determinations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 7. court's analysis of jurisdiction under rdb and sarfaesi. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 8. examination of statutory provisions affecting civil court jurisdiction. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. non-arbitrability principles restated by supreme court. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. supreme court’s recognition of civil court roles in debt challenges. (Para 27 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 11. comparison between rdb and sarfaesi provisions. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 12. judicial interpretations on jurisdictional overlaps. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 13. limitations of civil court jurisdiction over secured debts. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 14. petitioner’s obligations versus respondent's actions examined. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 15. legal assessment of issues raised by petitioners. (Para 47 , 4 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
