IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rekha Palli, J.
Dr. M.k. Shah Medical College - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 3271/2022 & CM APPL. 9518/2022 (stay)
Decided On : 01-04-2022
MEDICAL EDUCATION - PG COURSES - APPROVAL - [MEDICAL ASSESSMENT AND RATING BOARD (MARB)] - [NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION (NMC)] - [NMC ACT, 2019] - [MCI REGULATIONS, 2019] - MARB's disapproval of petitioner's applications for PG courses and partial approval for some courses - Challenge - Whether MARB's decision sustainable - Whether MARB justified in ignoring assessors' reports and forming its own arbitrary conclusions - Whether Court can interfere with MARB's decision - Held, MARB's decision unsustainable - MARB acted arbitrarily and not in consonance with regulations - Court can interfere with MARB's decision in certain cases - Writ petition allowed - Impugned communications quashed - MARB directed to forthwith issue letters of permission to petitioner institute to commence courses and increase seats as per applications.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a medical educational and research institute, challenged the disapproval of its applications for PG courses and partial approval for some courses by the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) of the National Medical Commission (NMC). The petitioner contended that the grounds for rejection were erroneous and that the MARB had ignored the assessors' reports and formed its own arbitrary conclusions.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the MARB's decision was unsustainable and that it had acted arbitrarily and not in consonance with the regulations. The Court held that it could interfere with the MARB's decision in certain cases, and allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned communications. The Court directed the MARB to forthwith issue letters of permission to the petitioner institute to commence courses and increase seats as per its applications.
Issues: Whether MARB's decision sustainable - Whether MARB justified in ignoring assessors' reports and forming its own arbitrary conclusions - Whether Court can interfere with MARB's decision
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the MARB's decision was unsustainable and that it had acted arbitrarily and not in consonance with the regulations. The Court held that it could interfere with the MARB's decision in certain cases, and allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned communications. The Court directed the MARB to forthwith issue letters of permission to the petitioner institute to commence courses and increase seats as per its applications.
Final Decision: Writ petition allowed - Impugned communications quashed - MARB directed to forthwith issue letters of permission to petitioner institute to commence courses and increase seats as per applications.
JUDGMENT
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails nine communications dated 11.02.2022 along with the amendments thereto issued on 15.02.2022 by the Medical Assessment and Rating Board of the National Medical Commission. Vide three of these communications, the petitioner's applications for grant of permission for commencing PG disciplines in three disciplines i.e. MD (Orthopaedics), MD (Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy) and MD (Respiratory Medicine) disciplines have been rejected. Vide the other six communications, the petitioner's applications for running MD (Obstetrics & Gynaecology), MD (Radio-Diagnosis), MD (Psychiatry), MD (Paediatrics), MS (General Surgery), and MD (General Medicine), MD (Respiratory Medicine) and MD (Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy) disciplines have been partially allowed.
2. The petitioner, Dr. M.K. Shah Medical College and Research Centre, is a medical educational and research institute, offering MBBS course since 29.05.2017. The respondent no.1 is Union of India (hereinafter referred to as 'UOI') through the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The respondent no.2/Medical Assessment and Rating Board (hereinafter referred to as MARB') is an autonomous board set up by the National Medical Council (hereinafter referred to as 'NMC') for the purpose of assessing and rating medical institutions to ensure compliance with the standards laid down by the Under Graduate ('UG') as well as the Post Graduate ('PG') Medical Education Boards constituted as per the regulations under the NMC Act, 2019. Since it is mainly the respondent no.2 that has defended the impugned orders, for the sake of convenience, the respondent no.2 will hereinafter be referred to as the respondent.
3. Pursuant to the Letter of Permission' issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India on 29.05.2017 for establishment of a new medical college with an annual intake of 150 MBBS students, the petitioner commenced its 1st batch of MBBS course in the academic year 2017-18. The petitioner was thereafter, granted renewals for conducting the MBBS course from time to time, with the latest one having been granted on 08.12.2021.
4. On 04.04.2019, the Medical Council of India (hereinafter referred to as the 'MCI') notified the Opening of a New or Higher Course of Study or Training (including Post-graduate course of Study or Training) and Increase of Admission Capacity in any Course of Study or Training (including a Post-graduate Course of Study or Training) (Amendment) Regulations (hereinafter referred to as the MCI Regulations), 2019'.These regulations as on date, do not require an institute to obtain essentiality certificates from the concerned State Governments to start a new medical course.
The said amended regulations also clearly say that an institute having permission for running an MBBS course, does not require any formal permission for starting a postgraduate course or for increase of annual intake of postgraduate course.
5. On 13.03.2020, the respondent no.1 issued a public notice no.23(1)(10A)/2019-Med/98730, inviting applications for increase of seats/commencement of PG medical disciplines by medical educational institutions in the academic year 2021-2022. Following this, a further notice was issued on 22.07.2020, whereby, institutions which did not have recognition were also granted liberty to submit their applications.
6. During this period, when the entire world was reeling under the effects of the Covid 19 pandemic, the petitioner hospital was on 16.05.2020, declared as a designated Covid hospital by the State Government, for the period between May-2020 to September-2020.The petitioner was once again designated as a designated Covid hospital for the periods between April-2021 to August-2021. Consequently, like all other Covid dedicated hospitals, it was also not permitte
CAG vs. K.S. Jagannathan(1986) 2 SCC 679
Kanachur Islamic Education Trust vs. Union of India (2017) 15 SCC 702
Manohar Lal Sharma vs. Medical Council of India (2013) 10 SCC 60
Medical Council of India vs. Vedanta Institute of Academic Excellence Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 7 SCC 225
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. vs. The Chief Election Commissioner
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489
When public interest is involved, facts emerging from subsequent events can be looked into to support an administrative order.
Compliance with regulatory standards, including faculty attendance and essential documentation, is mandatory for medical institutions seeking approval for postgraduate courses.
The court established that administrative bodies must adhere to procedural fairness by granting applicants the opportunity to rectify deficiencies before disapproval.
The denial of permission to establish an Ayurvedic Medical College was deemed unjustified due to lack of substantiated deficiencies, emphasizing the importance of function and regulation compliance.
The court held that expert regulatory bodies' assessments of medical institutions' deficiencies are not to be overridden by the judiciary unless significant jurisdictional errors are proven.
The court emphasized the need to encourage institutes with necessary infrastructure for running ayurvedic medical colleges to contribute to strengthening the infrastructure of the system of medicine ....
The court established that the National Medical Commission Act grants the MARB the authority to regulate medical education standards, including the power to reduce student intake based on inspection ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.