SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2503

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT 
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
M/s.Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital - Appellant 
Versus 
Union of India - Respondent 
W.P.(MD)Nos.126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455 and 456 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.114, 117, 128, 132, 133, 134, 122, 125, 127, 120, 123, 126, 115, 116, 118, 119, 121, 124, 129, 130, 131, 136, 137, 139, 135, 138, 140, 141, 142, 143, 291, 292, 296, 293, 294, 298, 303, 305, 307, 295, 297, 299, 328, 329, 331, 300, 301, 304, 306, 309, 311, 313, 315, 320, 308, 310, 312 of 2025
Decided on : 28-04-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.Manider Singh, Senior Advocate, For B.Saravanan Associates
For the Respondent:Mr.AR.L.Sunderesan, Additional Solicitor General of India,  Assisted by Mr.K.Govindarajan, Deputy Solicitor General of India, Ms.Subharanjini Anandh, Mr.T.Amjad Khan,  Government Advocate

Compliance with regulatory standards, including faculty attendance and essential documentation, is mandatory for medical institutions seeking approval for postgraduate courses.

Headnote:(A) National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Section 28 (6) - Challenges to orders rejecting approval for new PG courses at medical college - The college failed to provide necessary Essentiality Certificate and adequate faculty attendance leading to rejection - The first respondent correctly deemed the grounds of rejection valid based on regulatory compliance requirements. (Paras 24, 60, 66)

(B) The assessment and rating regulations set forth by the NMC intend to ensure standards in medical education, stressing that institution approval is contingent upon faculty presence and proper documentation. (Paras 18, 20, 21)

(C) Appeals - Writ petitions dismissed as the college made no substantial compliance with show cause requests, undermining its claims for approval. (Paras 66, 67)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner college was established in 2021 and applied for 21 new PG disciplines but was met with disapproval based on non-compliance with regulatory attendance and the absence of an Essentiality Certificate, leading to two appeals that were similarly rejected.

Findings of Court:
The college failed to rectify previously cited deficiencies despite having a chance to submit proper compliance, justifying the rejection of applications for new PG courses by the regulatory body.

Issues: The main issues were whether the college could benefit from the dispensation of the Essentiality Certificate and the adequacy of faculty compliance as per NMC regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that compliance with faculty requirements is non-negotiable and endorsed the necessity for Essentiality Certificates to ensure educational standards in medical training institutions.

Result: Writ Petitions are dismissed with no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. rejection based on inadequacies in faculty and essentiality certificate. (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments surrounding compliance with nmc regulations. (Para 11 , 14 , 15)
3. nmc's duties and regulations underscoring compliance. (Para 18 , 24 , 46)
4. the court's conclusion on the application of faculty and attendance standards. (Para 34 , 41 , 62)
5. final dismissal of writ petitions due to non-compliance. (Para 66)

ORDER :

Factual Matrix:-

These cases are with respect to the order passed by the first respondent in the second appeal filed under Section 28 (6) of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019, (herein after to be mentioned as NMC Act) by the writ petitioner Medical College regarding starting of new PG courses for 21 disciplines of broad and super speciality Post Graduate medical education, rejecting the second appeal, thereby confirming the decision of the first appeal Committee, that is, the second respondent dated 05.08.2024, which upheld the decision of the third respondent, that is, the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (herein after to be mentioned as MARB) dated 13.06.2024.

2. The writ petitioner College was established during the academic year 2021 - 2022 with an intake of 150 seats in the MBBS course. On 16.08.2023, the third respondent issued a public notice, inviting applications for starting New Courses/Increase of seats in Post Graduate courses, for the academic year 2024 - 2025. Pursuant to such notice, the petitioner college submitted applications for 21 disciplines of broad and super speciality Post Graduate medical education. Final order regarding the application of the petitioner College for starting new PG courses was passed by the third respondent on 13.06.2024, by issuing a letter of disapproval. The said letter of disapproval was issued on the basis of the review of the standard assessment form submitted by the petitioner College conducted by the third respondent Board along with the group of experts and review committee, on the basis of MARB Regulations, 2023, published on 2nd June 2023, PG - Medical Education Regulation, 2000, issued on 22nd August, 2000. Such letter of disapproval for the application of the petitioner College for the academic year 2024 - 2025 was issued as per Section 28 (3) proviso of the NMC Act, 2019, for not complying attendance, as per the AEBAS attendance per unit and for non- availability of Essentiality Certificate.

3. Following which, a show cause notice dated 28.03.2024, came to be issued by the third respondent with respect to the application of the petitioner college for 21 disciplines of broad and super speciality Post Graduate medical education for the academic year 2024 – 2025, directing the petitioner college to perform self assessment of its application as mentioned in Post Graduate Medical Education Regulation, 2000, and submit the report and also a compliance report on the deficiencies/inadequacies pointed out in the letter of disapproval along with duly filled and signed affidavit within 10 days from the date of issuance of the said show cause notice.

4. However, the petitioner college preferred first appeal before the second respondent on 04.07.2024, in this regard. The second respondent by E-mail dated 05.08.2024, communicated the petitioner college that the first appeal Committee after hearing the college authority and re- verifying the documents and records and pointing out the fact that the petitioner college do not have Essentiality Certificate upheld the decision of the third respondent/MARB. Hence, the petitioner College preferred second appeal before the first respondent on 12.09.2024. The first respondent by order dated 24.12.2024 and 08.01.2025 respectively, rejected the second appeal by the petitioner College for starting various disciplines of broad and super speciality Post Graduate medical education by separate rejection orders on the same day.

5. Challenging the rejection of these second appeals, the petitioner College has filed thes

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top