Back
JYOTI SINGH
Indian Oil Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
All India Petroleum Dealers Association Registered – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts about amendment to mdg-2012. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments of the appellants on contractual basis. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. arguments by responses against amendments. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. interveners' perspectives on the arguments presented. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. court's observations and reassertion of omcs' authority. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. final judgment and order of the court. (Para 86 , 87) |
JUDGMENT
SUMMARIUM, J. - Being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied by the common judgment and order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.(C) No. 10334/2017, W.P.(C) No.10746/2017 and W.P.(C) No. 11246/2017 dated 18.03.2020, Appellants have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeals. Appellants, herein, were Respondents No.2 to 4 respectively, in the writ Petitions. For the sake of convenience, parties are being referred to hereinafter, by their litigating status before this Court. The prime ground for challenge in the present Appeals, inter alia, is that by the impu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
