SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 381

ASHA MENON
Udipt Mani Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Nct of Delhi – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate. with Dr. Harsh Surana, Mr. Sandeep Malik & Ms. Dipti Jain, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Amit Pratap Singh Mr. Madhav Khurana with Mr. Sanjay Bhargava & Ms. Riya Arora, Advocates. for the complainant For the Applicant in Bail Appln. 1448/2022, Crl. M.As. 9156/2022 & 9157/2022:Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate. with Dr. Harsh Surana, Mr. Sandeep Malik & Ms. Dipti Jain, Advocates.For the Respondent in Bail Appln. 1448/2022, Crl. M.As. 9156/2022 & 9157/2022:Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with SI Amit Pratap Singh Mr. Madhav Khurana with Mr. Sanjay Bhargava & Ms. Riya Arora, Advocates. for the complainant

JUDGMENT :

Asha Menon, J.

1. These two bail applications under Section 438/439 of Cr.P.C. seeking bail have been moved by the accused in FIR No.261/2018 dated 20th December, 2018 registered under Sections 406/420 IPC by the Economic Offences Wing, Delhi.

2. Mr. Mohit Mathur, learned senior counsel for the applicants submitted that neither of the two applicants had been arrested in respect of the FIR and that they have duly participated in the investigations. It is further submitted that though the charge-sheet had been filed against the applicant/Manindra Jain, he had not been arrested, whereas the applicant/Udipt Mani Jain had been shown in Column No.12. Both accused were however summoned by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (for short ‘CMM’) vide order dated 20th December, 2021 directing their appearance on 16th February, 2022. Both the applicants appeared on that date and applied for regular bail. The learned CMM, while adjourning the hearing on the regular bail applications, granted interim bail to both the applicants, till these applications were disposed of.

3. The learned senior counsel submitted that the hearing on the regular bail applications was concluded on 9th Marc

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top