US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Rachna W/o Pawan – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. Nct Of Delhi) – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C”) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Smt. Rachna seeking cancellation of Bail granted by Ld. ASJ vide Order dated 24.12.2020 in case FIR No.28/2019 under Section 420 /406/467/468/471/34 INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) registered at Police Station Jagatpuri.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 28.09.2012 Smt. Rachna, the Petitioner along with Smt. Kanchan Kakkar, purchased the property measuring about 200 sq. yds. with
The court ruled that bail, while generally granted as a norm, may be revoked if serious allegations of fraud and potential flight risk arise, reflecting substantive judicial scrutiny of bail orders.
The court emphasized that bail should be denied if the accused's conduct poses a risk to the judicial process, particularly in cases involving serious offences and repeated criminal activity.
Cancellation of bail requires substantial grounds indicating misuse or misconduct; mere allegations of injustice without evidence do not suffice for revocation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that consistent violation of court directions and non-compliance with previous court orders can warrant the cancellation of bail. Additionally, the....
The court emphasized the limitations on the court's power to cancel bail and the need for strong and substantive reasons to arrest a person who is set at liberty by admitting him to bail.
Y v. State of Rajasthan
-
Read summaryP v. State of M.P.
-
Read summaryAjwar v.Waseem
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.