SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Rachna W/o Pawan – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. Nct Of Delhi) – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Avinash Lakhanpal, Advocate (through VC)
For the Respondent:Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State Mr. Vikas Padora, Mr. Dipanshu Chugh and Mr. Aakash Kumar, Advocates

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C”) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Smt. Rachna seeking cancellation of Bail granted by Ld. ASJ vide Order dated 24.12.2020 in case FIR No.28/2019 under Section 420 /406/467/468/471/34 INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) registered at Police Station Jagatpuri.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 28.09.2012 Smt. Rachna, the Petitioner along with Smt. Kanchan Kakkar, purchased the property measuring about 200 sq. yds. with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top