SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
In the matter of: Merta Investment Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, challenging impugned Order dated 14.07.2021 passed by the Director (Old Scheme Branch), Delhi Development Authority (Respondent No.2 herein) wherein the Petitioner’s request for allotment of Plot. No. 58, Pocket P, EPDP Colony, C.R. Park, New Delhi – 110019 (hereinafter, “the demised plot”) at 85% of the his Bid was rejected and allotment was cancelled.
2. The facts, in brief, leading up to the filing of the instant writ petition are as follows:
b) The demised plot was inspected by an architect hired by the Petitioner and it was found that the actual area of the same (106.55 sq. mtr.) was lesser than the area notified by the DDA (139.07 sq. mtr.). The Petitioner wrote to the DDA on 19.08.2019 requesting a verification
Champalal Binani v. CIT [(1971) 3 SCC 20 : AIR 1970 SC 645]
Chandra Singh v. State of Rajasthan [(2003) 6 SCC 545 : 2003 SCC (L&S) 951]
Haryana Financial Corpn. v. Jagdamba Oil Mills [(2002) 3 SCC 496]
LIC v. Asha Goel [(2001) 2 SCC 160 : AIR 2001 SC 549]
Punjab Roadways v. Punja Sahib Bus and Transport Co. [(2010) 5 SCC 235]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.