IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Chandra Prakash Tiwari, Ex Sgt 642859 - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 14983 of 2021
Decided On : 23-12-2021
Exemption - Pro Rata Pension - The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, with the right to appeal if not entitled, and imposed a deadline for payment with interest.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought pro rata pension claiming to be similarly placed to petitioners in previous cases and provided the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs).
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, with the right to appeal if not entitled, and imposed a deadline for payment with interest.
Issues: Claim for pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, and right to appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner is entitled to pro rata pension if similarly placed as in previous cases, with the right to appeal if not entitled.
Final Decision: The Indian Air Force is directed to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, with the right to appeal if not entitled, and imposed a deadline for payment with interest.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - CM APPL. 47294/2021 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 14983/2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.
5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases and the right to appeal if not entitled.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases, with the right to verification and appeal, and specified consequences for non-entitlemen....
The court's decision was based on the entitlement to pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons if not entitled, and the timely resolution of the matter.
Equitable treatment mandates that similarly placed individuals receive the same pension benefits, with rights for verification and appeal preserved.
The entitlement to pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and the consequences of non-payment of arrears with interest.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on being similarly placed to previous petitioners, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous petitions, NOCs, right to verification, and appeal.
Petitioners can receive pro rata pension if verified to be in similar circumstances as prior petitioners, with a provision for interest on delayed payments.
An individual claiming entitlement to pro rata pension must be evaluated based on the same criteria as established in analogous previous cases, with timely payment mandated.
Equal treatment under Article 14 mandates that similarly situated individuals must be granted the same entitlements, with a requirement for justification on any discrepancies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.