IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Ramesh Kumar, Ex Cpl 742018 N - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 774 of 2022
Decided On : 13-01-2022
Exemption - Pro Rata Pension - The court allowed exemption subject to all just exceptions and directed the Indian Air Force to grant the petitioner the same relief as granted in previous petitions for pro rata pension, with the right to verification and appeal.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought pro rata pension claiming to be similarly placed as in previous petitions and provided the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs).
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant the petitioner the same relief as granted in previous petitions for pro rata pension, with the right to verification and appeal.
Issues: Claim for pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, and communication of reasons if not entitled.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioner's claim, NOCs provided, and the right to verification and appeal, ensuring entitlement to pro rata pension.
Final Decision: The Indian Air Force was directed to grant the petitioner the same relief as granted in previous petitions for pro rata pension, with the right to verification and appeal, and payment of arrears with interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - CM aPPL. 2188/2022 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 774/2022
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th april, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.
5. accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents - Indian air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.
6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous petitions, NOCs, right to verification, and appeal.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on being similarly placed to previous petitioners, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.
The entitlement to pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and the consequences of non-payment of arrears with interest.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases and provision for further remedies if not entitled.
The entitlement to pro rata pension for similarly placed petitioners as established in previous cases.
Entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases and the right to appeal if not entitled.
The court mandates that if the petitioner is similarly placed as in prior judgements, pro-rata pension must be granted, reinforcing the obligation for verification and timely communication regarding ....
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for similarly situated individuals, emphasizing the requirement of verification and timely payment of entitlements.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases, with the right to verification and appeal, and specified consequences for non-entitlemen....
The court directed the payment of pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly situated as in prior decisions, establishing the principle of equality and fair treatment under law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.