SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1301

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Rajib Lochana Dhar, Ex Cpl 778909-b - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 1991 of 2022
Decided On : 02-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate, Divyansh Handa, Advocate, Rishabh Sahu, Advocate

Entitlement to pro rata pension based on being similarly placed to previous petitioners, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.

Headnote:

Exemption - Pro Rata Pension - The court allowed exemption subject to all just exceptions and directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner claimed to be similarly placed to petitioners in previous cases and sought the same relief of pro rata pension. The necessary No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.

Issues: Claim of being similarly placed to previous petitioners, entitlement to pro rata pension, and right to appeal if not found entitled.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's claim in comparison to previous cases and directed the grant of pro rata pension if found similarly placed, with the right to appeal if not entitled.

Final Decision: The Indian Air Force was directed to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, with the right to appeal if not found entitled.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

CM aPPL. 5729/2022 (Exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 1991/2022

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th april, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

4. accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents - Indian air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.

5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top