SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1244

MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Wipro Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Gst Mcie Division Cgst – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.Chandrashekara Bharathi, Advocate, Abhinav Kalia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - C.M.No.45404/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.14422/2021

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging Rule 86A of the CGST Rules as illegal, arbitrary and bad in law. Petitioner also seeks a direction declaring the continuance of blocking of petitioner’s ITC of INR 8,72,22,741/- beyond a period of one year as illegal on account of violation of express mandate of Rule 86A(3) and to unblock and restore the credit of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent had not given any reason to the petitioner justifying the blocking of credit and, thus, the impugned action is in violation of the principles of natural justice. He states that Rule 86A(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017 mandates that any restriction on the usage of ITC shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of imposing of such restriction. However he points out that in the present case, despite the period of one year having lapsed on 25th January, 2021, the respondent has not unblocked the ITC.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that despite

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top