Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Johri – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application filed under ndps act. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding violation of ndps provisions. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. hearing and perusal of records. (Para 4) |
| 4. surveillance and drug trafficking details. (Para 5) |
| 5. supreme court observations on drug trafficking and compliance. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. mandatory compliance with ndps provisions emphasized. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. conditions for granting bail under ndps act. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. bail application dismissed. (Para 12) |
| 9. request for expedited trial. (Para 13) |
| 10. non-prejudice to trial merits. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR No. 38/2016 registered under Sections 21 /29/61/85 of the NDPS Act at P.S. Special Cell (SB), Delhi.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant is in custody since 26.06.2016 and the charge sheet having been filed, he is no longer required for any investigation. She further submits that though the recovery of contraband is alleged to have taken place from the polythene bag held by the applicant, reading of the FIR wo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
