D. N. PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Karan Ahuja – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, CJ. - Present Public Interest Litigation has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-
"I. Direct the Respondent No. 3 to allow the Petitioner and his parents to be tested for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) at Delhi Government Dispensary, B-3 Sultanpuri, Delhi-86;
II. Direct the Respondents No. 1 to 3 to strike down Point No. (i) under the Recommended measures to optimize RTPCR in the Advisory dated 04.05.2021 issued by Respondent No. 2 which reads as follows, "i. RTPCR test must not be repeated in any individual who has tested positive once either by RAT or RTPCR."
III. Direct the Respondents to not put any direct or indirect prohibition on the right of a citizen to get oneself tested for any infection including SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
IV. Pass any other or further directions, orders or writ as this Hon'ble Court may, in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice."
2. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Respondents and looked into the facts and circumstances of the case. Looking to the counter affidavit filed by Respondent No.3/Directorate Gener
The court's discretion to dispose of a petition based on the lack of reason to keep it pending.
The right to health includes access to necessary testing for infections, and arbitrary restrictions on testing undermine this fundamental right.
The court may dispose of a petition as infructuous if the reliefs sought have already been addressed.
A public interest litigation is rendered infructuous when the reliefs sought have been effectively addressed by relevant authorities.
The court ruled that patients with COVID-19 symptoms must be admitted without RT-PCR test results, emphasizing the importance of following health directives and improving testing infrastructure.
Compulsion for plasma donation from recovered Covid-19 patients by the court is outside judicial purview; frivolous petitions do not merit public interest litigation.
The court's decision was based on directing the concerned authorities to consider the grievances and decide the pending representation in accordance with the law, rules, regulations, and government p....
Courts may dismiss public interest litigations challenging public health measures if the petitioner lacks expertise in the relevant field and the measures are in line with global efforts to prevent t....
The court's decision emphasized the importance of differentiating personal reliefs from those suitable for public interest litigation, and the need for compliance with SOPs in the context of the COVI....
The Court's decision was based on the change in circumstances, leading to the petition's irrelevance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.