SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1499

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Ramgopal Sharma & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
All India Institute Of Medical Sciences - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 9413 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 29236 of 2021, 33649 of 2021
Decided On : 10-11-2021

Advocates appeared:
Santhosh Krishnan, Advocate, Marzook Bafaki, Advocate, Dushyant Parashar, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rules set out in the Prospectus cannot be altered mid-way, and any disqualification for admission must be explicitly mentioned in the Prospectus.

Headnote:

AIIMS - Admission Rejection - Section 7 of the Prospectus - The judgment discusses the interpretation of the eligibility conditions for admission to the M.Sc. (Nursing) course at AIIMS and the application of a disqualification for distance education courses. The court found that the disqualification mentioned in the Prospectus did not apply to the M.Sc. (Nursing) course and set aside AIIMS' decision to reject the candidate's admission based on distance education qualification.

Fact of the Case:

The case concerns the rejection of a candidate's admission to the M.Sc. (Nursing) course at AIIMS due to obtaining a B.Sc. (Nursing) degree through distance education. The court found that the disqualification for distance education courses mentioned in the Prospectus did not apply to the M.Sc. (Nursing) course.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the disqualification for distance education courses mentioned in the Prospectus did not apply to the M.Sc. (Nursing) course and set aside AIIMS' decision to reject the candidate's admission based on distance education qualification.

Issues: The principal issue was whether the Prospectus contained a disqualification in respect of distance education courses while laying down eligibility conditions for the M.Sc. (Nursing) course.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the disqualification for distance education courses mentioned in the Prospectus did not apply to the M.Sc. (Nursing) course, and AIIMS' decision to reject the candidate's admission based on distance education qualification was set aside.

Final Decision: The court directed AIIMS to admit the candidate to the M.Sc. (Paediatric Nursing) course in the In-Service category in the 2021 session.

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. - The present writ petition concerns the decision of the respondent-All India Institute of Medical Sciences ["AIIMS"] to reject the candidature of the petitioner no. 1-Ramgopal Sharma ["Sharma"] for admission to the M.Sc. (Nursing) course in the 2021 admission session, on the ground that he had obtained the B.Sc. (Nursing) degree through distance education.

Facts

2. AIIMS offers various post-graduate (Masters degree) courses, including the M.Sc. (Nursing) course. For admission in the year 2021, it issued an Admission Notice, published on 02.03.2021, followed by a prospectus, which was uploaded on 27.04.2021 ["the Prospectus"]. These covered M.Sc. (Nursing), M.Sc. courses and M. Biotechnology. As far as the M.Sc. (Nursing) course is concerned, seven specialties were offered, including Paediatric Nursing. For the M.Sc. courses, the Prospectus enumerated eight specialties. For the M.Sc. (Nursing) course, in addition to the seats offered in various other categories, one seat in each specialty was reserved for AIIMS In-Service candidates.

3. Sharma is employed by AIIMS as a Nursing Officer since 2007. Prior to that, he completed a course in General Nursing and Midwifery/ Psychiatric Nursing from Akkamahadevi School of Nursing, Bidar, Karnataka in 2001. He was thereafter admitted to the Nurses and Midwife register maintained under the Delhi Nursing Council Act, 1997. During the course of his employment with AIIMS, he also undertook the degree of B.Sc. (Nursing) (Post Basic) from Indira Gandhi National Open University ["IGNOU"], which was conferred upon him in 2014.

4. Sharma, being a Nursing Officer presently employed by AIIMS, applied for admission to the M.Sc. (Paediatric Nursing) course in the In-Service category. For this purpose, he was granted a No Objection Certificate by AIIMS, New Delhi in April, 2021. Sharma participated in the entrance examination and secured an overall rank of 135. However, after the counselling held on 23.08.2021, his candidature was rejected with the following remarks:-

"Candidate reported on 23.08.21 candidate found not eligible, as he has done post basic from IGNOU (distant learning programme) and as per prospectus distant learning not allowed and with the approval of the Competent Authority, his case cannot be considered."

5. It is in these circumstances that the present writ petition has been filed. The principal ground of challenge urged by Sharma is that the Prospectus contained no provision disqualifying candidates who obtained their B.Sc. (Nursing) degree through distance education.

6. In addition to Sharma, the AIIMS Nurses Union ["ANU"] has been arrayed as petitioner no. 2 in this writ petition. Mr. Santhosh Krishnan, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the ANU supports the case made out by Sharma that the Prospectus contained no such bar, and in fact goes further to argue that AIIMS is not empowered to impose such a condition at all.

7. By an order dated 03.09.2021, this Court found a prima facie case in favour of Sharma, and directed maintenance of status quo with regard to admission to the M.Sc. (Paediatric Nursing) course in the In-Service category. By a further interim order dated 28.09.2021, it was also made clear that if Sharma succeeds in the writ petition, the Court will also consider grant of appropriate relief, including admission to the course in question in the In-Service category.

8. As AIIMS had provisionally accepted the candidature of another candidate (whose rank was lower than that of Sharma) in the second round of counselling, directions were also given on 03.09.2021 for service of the present petition upon the provisionally admitted candidate. Mr. Krishnan has filed an amended memo of parties impleading her as respondent no. 2 and also proof of service upon her by email. However, she has chosen not to enter appearance to contest these proceedings.

Relevant clauses of the Prospectus and the Admission Notice

9. The eligibility conditions for

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top