Jigyasa Tiwari (Minor) vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 472

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Jigyasa Tiwari (Minor) – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amrendra Pratap Singh, Swapnil Kumar.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Mahendra Pratap.

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Budhwar, J.

Contents
PRECLUDE	2
ARGUMENT OF THE PETITIONER	10
ARGUMENT OF RESPONDENTS	11
REPLICATION ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER	13
QUESTION OF DETERMINATION	13
SYMPOSIUM	13
SUMMATION	34
CONCLUSION	34

1. Heard Sri Swapnil Kumar and Sri Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned counsels for the petitioner, Sri Mahendra Pratrap, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 as well as Sri Sharad Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel.

PRELUDE

2. Beseeching bizarre persecution a medical intern has petitioned before this Court seeking judicial avowal of the eligibility deficiency opportune to admission in M.B.B.S. course and perpetuation of the same on makeshift arrangement.

3. Factual matrix as worded in the writ petition is that on 17.06.2019 a Government Order bearing no. 985/71-4-2019-07-2018 was issued by respondent no. 1 addressed to respondent no. 2 setting out the criteria pertaining to admission in M.B.B.S./B.D.S. courses for the academic session 2019-2020.

4. Thereafter, in continuation of the same, the respondent no. 2 issued N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(All) 472

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VIKAS BUDHWARJigyasa Tiwari (Minor) – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (47)

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Jigyasa Tiwari (Minor) – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent