SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1150

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, Jyoti Singh, JJ.
Dps Rajesh - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 2848 of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 9875 of 2020
Decided On : 08-11-2021

Advocates appeared:
Amit Saxena, Advocate, Jatin Puniyani, Advocate, Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate, Ayushi Bansal, Advocate, Vikrant Chawla, Advocate, Anil Grover, Advocate, Noopur Singhal, Advocate
.

Courts may direct respondents to consider petitions as representations and address grievances in accordance with the law and regulations.

Headnote:

Yulu Bikes - Public Interest Litigation - The court directed the respondents to consider the petition as a representation and address the grievances in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking various reliefs related to the usage of Yulu bikes and the safety and security of the public.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and address the grievances in accordance with the law, rules, regulations, and government policies.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the respondents to consider the grievances raised in the petition and take appropriate action in accordance with the applicable legal framework.

Final Decision: The writ petition along with pending application is hereby disposed of.

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, CJ. - Present Public Interest Litigation has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-

    "a. Direct the Respondent no. 1-5 to make effective guidelines so that Yulu bikes are not being allowed to be used by any minors, to ensure the safety and security of the public at large;

    b. Direct the Respondent no. 1 to make necessary amendments in the Motor Vehicles Act, wherein the usage of Yulu Bikes comes under the ambit of the Motor Vehicles Act;

    c. Direct the Respondent no. 1 to make necessary effective rules for riding Yulu bikes besides making registration and insurance of the Yulu bikes compulsory;

    d. Direct the Respondent numbers 2 and 4 to ban the usage of Yulu Bikes until guidelines for the operation of Yulu bikes is framed, to ensure the safety of riders and the public at large;

    e. Direct the Respondent no. 1 to get constructed a dedicated lane for the cycle riders/e-scooter riders in the prescribed zone;

    f. Direct the Respondent no 6 to refrain its services till a dedicated lane is made for the same."

    2. We have heard learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties and have looked into the facts and circumstances of the case. We hereby direct the Respondents to treat this writ petition as a representation and look into the grievances ventilated in the writ petition and take a decision thereon in accordance with law, rules & regulations and Government policies, applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case, as expeditiously as possible.

    3. With these observations, the writ petition along with pending application is hereby disposed of.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top