RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Anurag Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Shakdher, J.:-- (Oral)
CM No. 30133/2021
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CM No. 30132/2021
2. Via this application, the petitioner, inter alia, seeks exemption from filing a copy of the impugned order dated 31.08.2021.
2.1. We may note, even though the title of the application, refers to the impugned order dated 31.08.2021, however, inadvertently, in the prayer clause of the captioned application, it appears that a typographical error has crept in, inasmuch as the date of the impugned order, is mentioned, as 09.08.2021.
3. Mr. Anjuman Tripathy, who appears for the petitioner, says that, he was not able to file a copy of the impugned order dated 31.08.2021, as the said order was uploaded on the concerned website only, on 06.09.2020.
4. Mr. Tripathy has, however, screen-shared the copy of the impugned order, dated 31.08.2021. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, who appears for respondents/UOI, on advance notice, does not dispute the veracity of the said order.
5. Therefore, the application is disposed of, with a direction to the petitioner, to place the certified copy of the impugned order dated 31.08.2021, on record of this Court, notwithstanding the order passed hereinbelow, for the pu
The court declined to interfere with the tribunal's proceedings and emphasized the importance of the tribunal deciding the matter on the date fixed.
The right to fair evaluation in examination contexts necessitates that technicalities, such as signature issues, be addressed without undermining a candidate's opportunity for assessment, ensuring pr....
The importance of fair and transparent examination processes and the need to ensure uniform application of instructions for marking answer sheets.
The court affirmed the necessity for tribunal adherence to procedural fairness and the importance of protecting applicants' rights pending substantive hearings, particularly in examination and select....
Procedural irregularities in an adjudicatory process cannot be sustained, and the person(s) who hear an aggrieved party must decide and render reasons.
Quasi-judicial authorities must pronounce reasoned orders in open court with immediate file availability; certified copies require date endorsements for limitation exclusion; detailed procedural dire....
The court emphasized the discretionary power of the court to condone procedural defects in appeals and highlighted that the interest of justice should not be constrained by hyper-technical interpreta....
The emergence of previously undisclosed evidence warrants review of administrative decisions to ensure fair adjudication.
The limitation for filing an appeal begins upon the pronouncement of the order and not its publication, making delays uncondonable if not filed timely.
The delay in approaching the court and failure to explain the delay can work against the petitioner in seeking relief.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.