SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1202

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Duggar Fiber Pvt Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 8549/2021
Decided On : 17-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Satish Kumar Paanchal& Mr. Ghanshyam Mishra, Advocates, for the Petitioner; Mr. Nausshad Ahmed Khan, ASC with Mr. Zahid and Ms. Manisha Chauhan, Advocates, for the GNCTD; Ms. Mini Pushkarana, Standing Counsel with Ms. Khushboo Nahar and Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocates, for the North DMC

The right to a fair hearing and proper assessment process in property tax matters.

Headnote:

Property Tax - Assessment Order - The court set aside the impugned order and demand notice, remitted the matter to the assessing authority for a fresh assessment order, and directed the respondent to provide a copy of the notice to the petitioner and grant a personal hearing.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a restraint on the respondent from taking coercive action based on a letter demanding arrears of property tax, citing irregularities in the assessment order and non-receipt of a notice.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the impugned order and demand notice, remitted the matter to the assessing authority for a fresh assessment order, and directed the respondent to provide a copy of the notice to the petitioner and grant a personal hearing.

Issues: Irregularities in the assessment order, non-receipt of notice, and coercive action by the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the petitioner had not received the notice and had not been granted a personal hearing, and there were infirmities in the assessment order, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned order and demand notice.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for a fresh assessment order, with directions for the respondent to provide a copy of the notice to the petitioner and grant a personal hearing.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.:--

CM APPLN. 26444/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P. (C) 8549/2021

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a restraint on the respondent from taking coercive action based on a letter dated 05.08.2021 whereby arrears of  property tax has been demanded from the petitioner. Said letter has been issued pursuant to assessment order dated 30.03.2021 under Section 123(D) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 2003.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been regularly filing its property tax returns and paying the property tax.

4. He submits that no notice alleged to have been sent to the petitioner on 08.12.2020 was ever received or an opportunity of hearing granted. Learned counsel further points out that the assessment order dated 30.03.2021 also suffers from some infirmities apparent of calculation errors.

5. He submits that petitioner has already deposited a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs under protest, however, despite the same respondents are seeking to take coercive action against the petitioner.

6. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final disposal.

7. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that since there is an allegation that notice under Section 123(D) dated 08.12.2020 was not received by the petitioner and an opportunity of hearing was not granted, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, respondents are willing to give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

8. In view of the above, impugned order dated 30.03.2021 and the demand notice dated 05.08.2021 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority to pass a fresh assessment order.

9. Respondent shall furnish to the petitioner a copy of notice dated 08.12.2020 within a period of three days from today. On receipt of the same, the petitioner shall file reply/objections to the same within a period of 10 days thereafter.

10. Officers of the respondent would be at liberty to inspect the property if so required. Petitioner shall cooperate with the inspection of the property, if so demanded, by the officers of the Corporation.

11. Petitioner shall thereafter appear before the assessing authority on 20.09.2021 at 3.00 p.m. for a personal hearing.

12. Petitioner shall further deposit another sum of Rs. One lakh with the respondent within a period of two weeks from today. Said amount of Rs. 3 lakhs already deposited and Rs. One lakh which has now been directed to be deposited shall be subject to the fresh assessment order to be passed by the Assessing Authority and liable to be refunded/adjusted if warranted.

13. Petition is allowed in the above terms. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

14. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top