IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Duggar Fiber Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8549 of 2021
Decided On : 17-08-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. restraint on coercive action regarding property tax demand. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner’s compliance with property tax and errors in assessment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's recognition of rights and ordering a personal hearing. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. setting aside previous orders and remitting for fresh assessment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. final petition order and notification of proceedings. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
CM APPLN. 26444/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P. (C) 8549/2021
1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner seeks a restraint on the respondent from taking coercive action based on a letter dated 05.08.2021 whereby arrears of property tax has been demanded from the petitioner. Said letter has been issued pursuant to assessment order dated 30.03.2021 under Section 123(D) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 2003.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been regularly filing its property tax returns and paying the property tax.
4. He submits that no notice alleged to have been sent to the petitioner on 08.12.2020 was ever received or an opportunity of hearing granted. Learned counsel further points out that the assessment order dated 30.03.2021 also suffers from some infirmities apparent of calculation errors.
5. He submits that petitioner has already deposited a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs under protest, however, despite the same respondents are seeking to take coercive action against the petitioner.
6. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final disposal.
7. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that since there is an allegation that notice under Section 123 (D) dated 08.12.2020 was not received by the petitioner and an opportunity of hearing was not granted, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, respondents are willing to give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.
8. In view of the above, impugned order dated 30.03.2021 and the demand notice dated 05.08.2021 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority to pass a fresh assessment order.
9. Respondent shall furnish to the petitioner a copy of notice dated 08.12.2020 within a period of three days from today. On receipt of the same, the petitioner shall file reply/objections to the same within a period of 10 days thereafter.
10. Officers of the respondent would be at liberty to inspect the property if so required. Petitioner shall cooperate with the inspection of the property, if so demanded, by the officers of the Corporation.
11. Petitioner shall thereafter appear before the assessing authority on 20.09.2021 at 3.00 p.m. for a personal hearing.
12. Petitioner shall further deposit another sum of Rs. One lakh with the respondent within a period of two weeks from today. Said amount of Rs. 3 lakhs already deposited and Rs. One lakh which has now been directed to be deposited shall be subject to the fresh assessment order to be passed by the Assessing Authority and liable to be refunded/adjusted if warranted.
13. Petition is allowed in the above terms. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.
14. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.
The right to a fair hearing necessitates an opportunity for a personal hearing before coercive actions related to property tax assessment are undertaken.
The right to a fair hearing and proper assessment process in property tax matters.
A property tax assessment must be preceded by a specific and detailed show cause notice; otherwise, the assessment is invalid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the direction for the petitioner to continue paying property tax as per the base assessment year of 2004-05 and the allowance for the petitioner to....
Court reinforces the need for proper assessment procedures in property tax matters, emphasizing compliance with prior judicial directives and the provision of fair hearing.
The principle of natural justice and the requirement for factual accuracy in assessment orders were central to the court's decision.
Assessment orders cannot be issued without prior show cause notices to relevant parties, ensuring procedural fairness.
The court emphasized the requirement of a fair hearing prior to the issuance of an ex parte assessment order, reinforcing principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
Property tax – Assessment - Petitioner/authorized representative shall appear before Assistant Assessor and Collector, ASC Department and produce requisite documents in support of assessment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.