Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Bhavkaran Singh Bal – Appellant
Versus
State & Ors – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
CRL. M.A. 6016/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.1177/2021 & CRL.M.A.6015/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.125/2015, registered at PS EOW, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent Nos.2 and 3 present in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent Nos.2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are personally present in Court through video conferencing with their counsel and they have been identified by Insp. Arun Tyagi/IO and submits that matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
8. Petitioner and respondent Nos.2 and 3 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 23.12.2019.
9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FI
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the matter further.
The court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and do not wish to prosecute further, as continued prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
Court can quash FIR when parties amicably settle disputes, confirming that further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court may quash an FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent does not wish to prosec....
Amicable settlements between parties provide a valid basis for quashing FIRs when further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
In cases of amicable settlement, a victim's consent to discontinue prosecution justifies quashing the FIR in the interest of justice.
The court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and do not wish to pursue prosecution, ensuring judicial efficiency.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and no useful purpose would....
Amicable settlements between parties can lead to the quashing of FIRs when further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Settlement of disputes between parties can be a valid ground for quashing FIR and consequent proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
