SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Bhavkaran Singh Bal - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 1177 of 2021
Decided On : 13-04-2021




The court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and do not wish to prosecute further, as continued prosecution would serve no useful purpose.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections related to FIR - Quashing of FIR - The petitioner sought direction for quashing FIR No. 125/2015, stating resolution of disputes between parties - The court noted that due to settlement, further prosecution serves no useful purpose. (Paras 3, 8, 10)

(B) Amicable Settlement - The matter being settled between parties through a Memorandum of Understanding leads to the conclusion that continued prosecution is unwarranted. (Paras 7, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed for quashing an FIR and stated that the disputes have been amicably settled with respondents who appeared through video conferencing with no objection to the petition.

Findings of Court:
The court found that in light of the settlement and absence of objection from the affected parties, the FIR and related proceedings could be quashed.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the FIR should be quashed given the amicable settlement between the parties involved.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that when parties reach an amicable resolution and express a desire to discontinue the proceedings, prosecution should not continue if it serves no purpose.

Result: Petition allowed and FIR quashed.

Table of Content
1. petition to quash fir due to settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. parties have amicably settled their disputes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's inclination to quash the fir. (Para 9)
4. fir quashed as not serving useful purpose. (Para 10)
5. petition allowed and application disposed. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

CRL. M.A. 6016/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.1177/2021 & CRL.M.A.6015/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.125/2015, registered at PS - EOW, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent Nos.2 and 3 present in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent Nos.2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are personally present in Court through video conferencing with their counsel and they have been identified by Insp. Arun Tyagi/IO and submits that matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8. Petitioner and respondent Nos.2 and 3 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 23.12.2019.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.125/2015, registered at PS - EOW, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

12. Pending application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top