SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Bhavkaran Singh Bal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition to quash fir due to settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. parties have amicably settled their disputes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's inclination to quash the fir. (Para 9)
4. fir quashed as not serving useful purpose. (Para 10)
5. petition allowed and application disposed. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

CRL. M.A. 6016/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.1177/2021 & CRL.M.A.6015/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.125/2015, registered at PS - EOW, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent Nos.2 and 3 present in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent Nos.2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are personally present in Court through video conferencing with th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top