Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Jamil Ahmed - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 689 of 2021
Decided On : 03-03-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amicable settlement leads to quashing of fir (Para 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. court considers party consent for resolution (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. legal decision to quash fir based on settlement (Para 10) |
| 4. petition allowed and application disposed of (Para 11 , 12) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
CRL. M.A. 3362/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.689/2021 & CRL.M.A.3361/2021 (stay)
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.452/2016, registered at PS - Bhajanpura, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent nos.2 to 5 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent nos. 2 to 5 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Respondent nos.2 to 5 are personally present in Court through video conferencing with their counsel and they have been identified by SI Rahul and submit that matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
8. Petitioners and respondent nos.2 to 8 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Compromise Deeds/MoUs dated 23.01.2021 and 11.02.2021.
9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.
10. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.452/2016, registered at PS - Bhajanpura, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
11. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
12. Pending application also stands disposed of.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
The court validated the quashing of an FIR based on the parties' amicable settlement, indicating that prosecution lacks utility when disputes are resolved.
The court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and do not wish to prosecute further, as continued prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainants express a desire not to proceed with prosecution.
The court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and do not wish to pursue prosecution, ensuring judicial efficiency.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties amicably settle their disputes, affirming the principle that prosecution continues only when necessary.
Amicable settlements between parties can result in the quashing of FIRs when all parties express no desire to continue prosecution.
Quashing of an FIR is justified when parties settle their disputes amicably and express no wish to continue prosecution.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
Court can quash FIR when parties amicably settle disputes, confirming that further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
