IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
In Re : Pbe India Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
. - Respondent
Co Pet No. 7 of 2021
Decided On : 18-03-2021
Companies Act - Voluntary Winding Up - Section 497(6) - 1956 Act, Section 484(1)(b), Section 488(2)(b), Section 485(1), Section 490, Section 516, Rule 313, Rule 315, Rule 329 - The court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up of the company based on the satisfaction recorded by the Official Liquidator that necessary compliances of Section 497 of the Act and other relevant provisions have been made, and that the affairs of the company have not been conducted in any manner prejudicial to the interest of its members or to the public.
Fact of the Case:
The petition is filed under Section 497(6) of The Companies Act, 1956 by the Official Liquidator seeking voluntary winding up of the Company PBE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up of the company based on the satisfaction recorded by the Official Liquidator.
Issues: Voluntary winding up of the company, compliance with relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the satisfaction recorded by the Official Liquidator that necessary compliances of Section 497 of the Act and other relevant provisions have been made, and that the affairs of the company have not been conducted in any manner prejudicial to the interest of its members or to the public.
Final Decision: The petition for voluntary winding up of the company was allowed, and the company stands dissolved from the date of filing the petition.
JUDGMENT
C. Hari Shankar, J. - This petition is filed under Section 497(6) of The Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as 'the Act') by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking voluntary winding up of the Company PBE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (in members Voluntary Liquidation) (herein referred to as the 'petitioner Company').
2. A perusal of the petition shows that the petitioner Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act on 15th May, 1995, having Corporate Identity Number U74899DL1995PTC068500, under the provisions of the Companies Act 1956, with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana having registered office situated at 204-206, Tolstoy House, 15, Tolstoy Marg, Delhi - 110001.
3. That the Authorized Share Capital of the petitioner Company (in Vol. Liqn.) is ? 6,55,00,000/- (Rupees Six Crore Fifty-Five Lakhs Only) divided into 65,50,000 (Sixty-Five Lakh Fifty Thousand) equity shares of ? 10/- (Rupees Ten) each.
4. At the time of Members' Voluntary Winding up of the petitioner Company, there were two shareholders and three directors namely Mr. Chitranjan Dua, Mr. Sunil Malik and Mr. John Raymond Stoebner. The financial position of the petitioner Company as disclosed in the audited balance sheets ending as on 31st July, 2010 and 31st December, 2009 are annexed to the petition.
5. In a Board meeting held on 25th October, 2010, the Declaration of Solvency was executed and approved by the Board of Directors. It was declared by all the Directors of the petitioner Company that they have made a full enquiry into the affairs of the Company, and having done so, they have formed the opinion that the petitioner Company has no debts. The Declaration of Solvency was filed with the Registrar of Companies on 26th October, 2010 in the prescribed Form No. 149 read with Rule 313 of the Companies (Court), Rules 1959 alongwith the Statement of the Company's Assets and Liabilities as at 22nd October, 2010 being the latest practicable date. An Independent Auditor's Report as per requirement under Section 488(2)(b) of the Companies Act 1956, has been attached with the Declaration of Solvency. The said documents are annexed to this present petition.
6. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 484(1)(b) and other applicable provisions of the 'Act', an Extra-ordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the petitioner Company was convened and held on 4th November, 2010 at the registered office of the petitioner Company situated at 204-206, Tolstoy House, 15, Tolstoy Marg, Delhi-110001 for passing a special resolution for voluntary winding up of the petitioner Company by its members. Accordingly, a special resolution was passed that the petitioner Company be wound up voluntarily and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Chartered Accountant was appointed as a Voluntary Liquidator u/s 490 of the Act. It is stated that the copy of minutes of the Extra Ordinary General Meeting dated 4th November, 2010 alongwith Form 23 has been filed with the ROC.
7. The petitioner Company has given notice of the resolution for members voluntary winding up, as required under Section 485(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 by advertisement in "Jansatta" (Hindi) and "The Indian Express" (English) on 8th November, 2010 respectively as well as in the Official Gazette (English & Hindi) on 4th December, 2010.
8. The notice by the Voluntary Liquidator of his appointment under Section 516 of the Act read with Rule 315 of the Company's (Court) Rule, 1959 was given in Form No. 151 as published in the newspapers and Official Gazette on 8th November, 2010 and 4th December, 2010 respectively (as mentioned in para 7 of this order) and in Form No. 152 for his appointment before the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana on 9th November, 2010. A copy of Form filed with Registrar of Companies alongwith copy of publication in the Official Gazette are annexed to the petition.
9. The Voluntary Liquidator has called the Final General Meeting of the members by advertisement of notice in Form No. 155 published in t
Satisfaction of necessary compliances and non-prejudicial conduct of the company's affairs are crucial for allowing voluntary winding up under the Companies Act, 1956.
Court confirmed compliance with statutory requirements for voluntary winding up, concluding no outstanding claims or prejudicial elements were present, thus allowing dissolution.
The court's decision was based on the satisfaction of compliance with the relevant provisions of The Companies Act, 1956 and the absence of prejudicial conduct towards the interest of the members or ....
Voluntary winding up of a company requires strict adherence to statutory provisions, including a Declaration of Solvency confirming no outstanding debts.
The voluntary liquidation process and compliance with the Companies Act provisions were crucial in determining the dissolution of the company.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court may order the dissolution of a company in members voluntary liquidation if it is satisfied that all necessary compliance of relev....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the dissolution of a company in members voluntary liquidation under the Companies Act, 1956 is contingent upon the satisfaction of the Offi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the voluntary liquidation proceedings, including the declaration of solvency, appointment of voluntary liquidator, filing of accounts, and the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the fulfillment of the procedural requirements for voluntary liquidation and dissolution under the Companies Act, 1956, is crucial for the cou....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the fulfillment of statutory requirements and the confirmation of non-prejudicial conduct in the voluntary liquidation process as per the Compan....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.