IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
In Re : Obs Sales Private Limited (in Vol Liqn) - Appellant
Versus
. - Respondent
Company Petition No. 20 of 2020
Decided On : 05-02-2021
Companies Act - Dissolution of Company - Section 497(6)
Fact of the Case:
The company petition was filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking the dissolution of OBS SALES PRIVATE LIMITED. The company had undergone voluntary liquidation, and the petition sought the company's dissolution from the date of the filing of the petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the petition and ordered the winding up of the company, deeming it to be dissolved from the date of the filing of the petition.
Issues: The main issue was whether the company should be dissolved following the voluntary liquidation process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the declaration of solvency, appointment of voluntary liquidator, submission of accounts, no dues certificate, and opinions of the Official Liquidator and the Registrar of Companies in reaching the decision to dissolve the company.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, ordered the winding up of the company, and deemed it to be dissolved from the date of the filing of the petition.
JUDGMENT
C. Hari Shankar, J. - This is the company petition, preferred under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The prayer made in the petition is that the subject company, i.e. OBS SALES PRIVATE LIMITED, be dissolved from the date of the filing of the instant petition.
2. The record shows that the subject Company was incorporated on 28th
3. That the Authorized share capital of the company is ?1,50,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Fifty Lacs Only) divided into 15,00,000 (Fifteen Lakh) Equity shares of ?10/- (Ten) each. March, 2011, with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The Corporate Identity Number of the Company is U51109DL2011FTC216633. The registered office of the subject Company is stated to be situated at Plot No. 225, 3rd Floor, Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi, within the territory of the NCT of Delhi.
4. As per the records, majority of Shares i.e. 14,99,999 shares were held by Oriental Buying Services ltd and rest of the shares were held by Mr. Daneil Paitto as nominee of Oriental Buying Services Ltd.
5. The directors of the Company in voluntary liquidation, as on the date of passing the resolution of voluntary winding up, were Mr. Margotti Antonio and Mr. Stefano Sala.
6. The Board of Directors of the Company in their meeting held on 26th November, 2014 executed and approved a declaration of solvency, which stated that after having made a full inquiry into the affairs of the company, an opinion had been formed that the company would be able to pay its debts in full, within a period of three years from the commencement of the winding up. The declaration of solvency was accompanied with the statement of the company s assets and liabilities as on 31st
7. An extra-ordinary general meeting of the members of the Company was held on 9 July, 2014. The said declaration was filed with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana, New Delhi, in Form 149, as prescribed under Rule 313 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and Section 488 of the Companies Act, 1956. th
8. The notification for appointment of the Voluntary Liquidator, as required under Section 516 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with February, 2015, at the registered office of the Company, where a special resolution for the voluntary liquidation of the company was passed and one M/s Suresh Gupta & Associates, Company Secretaries, was appointed as the Voluntary Liquidator of the Company. Rule 315 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 in Form No. 151, was published in the Official Gazette on 14th March, 2015 and in the newspapers, The STATESMAN (English) and VIR ARJUN (Hindi) on 14th February, 2015. Further, the Voluntary Liquidator had filed notice of his appointment, in Form 152, with the Registrar of Companies, on 17th
9. The Voluntary Liquidator, as required under Section 497 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with Rule 329, published the notification, in Form No. 155, regarding the holding of the final general meeting on 22 February, 2015. nd June, 2017 in the newspapers The Pioneer (English) and The Pioneer (Hindi) on 9th May, 2017 and in Official Gazette on 3rd
10. The Voluntary Liquidator has filed accounts of the Company in Form No. 156 and 157, as prescribed under Rule 329 and 331 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 for the period from 9 June, 2017. th February, 2015 to 8th May, 2017 before the Registrar of Companies, NCT Of Delhi and Haryana on 5th
11. The Voluntary Liquidator has furnished a no dues certificate, stating that the company had no outstanding dues, as on date. July, 2017, within the prescribed period. As per the statement of accounts of the winding up process, a total of ?13,55,708.05/- was recovered during the winding up process and same were used towards the remuneration of the liquidator, publication of notices, professional fees, incidental & outlay charges and towards statutory tax dues and nothing was paid to the contributories as part of their capital as well as dividend and Securities payment.
12. The Voluntary Liqui
The voluntary liquidation process and compliance with the Companies Act provisions were crucial in determining the dissolution of the company.
The court affirmed that a company can be dissolved when it meets statutory requirements and has no outstanding liabilities, ensuring compliance with the Companies Act.
The court emphasized the importance of following the voluntary liquidation procedures and conducting the company's affairs in a non-prejudicial manner as prerequisites for dissolution under Section 4....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the voluntary liquidation proceedings, including the declaration of solvency, appointment of voluntary liquidator, filing of accounts, and the....
Satisfaction of necessary compliances and non-prejudicial conduct of the company's affairs are crucial for allowing voluntary winding up under the Companies Act, 1956.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the fulfillment of the procedural requirements for voluntary liquidation and dissolution under the Companies Act, 1956, is crucial for the cou....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the fulfillment of statutory requirements and the confirmation of non-prejudicial conduct in the voluntary liquidation process as per the Compan....
The court's decision was based on the satisfaction of compliance with the relevant provisions of The Companies Act, 1956 and the absence of prejudicial conduct towards the interest of the members or ....
The court's decision was influenced by the company's compliance with the requirements for voluntary winding up and dissolution under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court may order the dissolution of a company in members voluntary liquidation if it is satisfied that all necessary compliance of relev....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.