RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Summy Bhasin – Appellant
Versus
State NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. - The present petition U/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 16.12.2020 passed in Revision Petition No. 96/2020, by the learned District and Sessions Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, and quash the complaint filed by the Respondent no.2, being CC No. 7398/19, pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi."
2. The facts of the case are that in January-2009, accused No2 Guneet Bhasin. accused No. 3 Sumit Bhasin and accused No.4 Smt. Summy Bhasin (Petitioner herein) approached Respondent No 2/Complainant and allured him into investing Rs 50 lacs in their company with the assurance that same would be doubled in five years and relying on such assurances, he invested his lifetime savings with them; and in March-2014 the accused persons failed to return the principal amount with interest being total of Rs 1 Crore but then he was further inducted to invest Rs 20 lacs more with the promise to return Rs. 2 crores on or before March-2019 and that MoU dated 26.07
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.