SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1685

SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Gulshan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jyoti Srivastava, Advocate, Pradeep Kataria, Advocate, Panna Lal Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - Vide this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.216/2016, under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, registered at police station Pandav Nagar, Delhi.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in this Court and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.

5. The marriage between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No.2/wife was solemnized on 24.05.2015 and due to temperamental differences, the marriage could not work and they started living separately since 15.11.2015. The matrimonial dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR in question.

6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No.2/wife has been amicably resolved through Delhi Mediation Centre and terms of settlement are recorded in the order dated 19.01.2019. It is stated that joint petition under Section 13 B(2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top