IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Gulshan Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 1454 of 2020 & Crl.M.A. 2047 of 2021 and Crl.M.A. 5663 of 2020
Decided On : 18-02-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage dispute leading to fir. (Para 1 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. complainant's presence and acceptance of proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. settlement terms acted upon and no objection raised. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's inclination to quash based on resolution. (Para 9) |
| 5. quashing of fir and disposal of petition. (Para 10 , 11) |
1. Vide this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.216/2016, under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, registered at police station Pandav Nagar, Delhi.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in this Court and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.
4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.
5. The marriage between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No.2/wife was solemnized on 24.05.2015 and due to temperamental differences, the marriage could not work and they started living separately since 15.11.2015. The matrimonial dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR in question.
6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No.2/wife has been amicably resolved through Delhi Mediation Centre and terms of settlement are recorded in the order dated 19.01.2019. It is stated that joint petition under Section 13 B(2) under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been allowed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi and decree of divorce has been granted on 29.01.2020.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the terms of settlement have been acted upon and the balance amount of Rs.8,00,000/- by way of demand draft bearing No. `040614' dated 16.02.2021 has been handed over to respondent No.2 today in the Court, who has accepted the same.
8. Respondent No.2, who is the complainant of FIR in question, affirms that the terms of settlement have been fully acted upon and states that she has `no objection' to the quashing of FIR in question.
9. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the proceedings arising out of the present FIR.
10. For the reasons afore noted, FIR No.216/2016, under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, registered at police station Pandav Nagar, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating there-from against the petitioners, are hereby quashed.
11. The petition and pending application are accordingly disposed of.
An FIR can be quashed when the underlying dispute is amicably settled and all parties consent to the resolution.
The amicable resolution of a matrimonial dispute through mediation and the acceptance of settlement terms can lead to the quashing of FIR under relevant sections of the IPC.
Amicable settlement in matrimonial disputes can lead to quashing of FIRs under IPC when no useful purpose would be served by ongoing proceedings.
Court quashed FIR due to amicable settlement of matrimonial disputes, indicating that continued legal proceedings served no purpose.
Court can quash FIR under IPC when parties amicably settle their disputes, confirming resolution by mutual agreement.
The court can quash an FIR under IPC sections concerning matrimonial disputes when parties reach an amicable settlement, rendering further prosecution purposeless.
A court can quash an FIR when a matrimonial dispute is amicably settled, demonstrating that continued proceedings are unnecessary.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties amicably settle their matrimonial dispute, supported by a mutual consent divorce.
An FIR can be quashed when the complainant does not wish to prosecute after reaching an amicable settlement.
Cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, as held in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.