IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Ashish @ Ashish Kumar Sagar - Appellant
Versus
State & Anr. - Respondents
Crl M C (Criminal Miscellaneous Case) No. 389 of 2021; Crl M A (Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal) No. 2060 of 2021
Decided On : 11-02-2021
Quashing of FIR - Marriage and Compromise - The court considered the marriage between the petitioner and the prosecutrix, along with the compromise deed, and decided to quash the FIR under Sections 376/506 IPC.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought the quashing of FIR No. 330/2020, under Sections 376/506 IPC, as the prosecutrix and the petitioner had resolved their misunderstanding, married, and the prosecutrix did not wish to pursue the proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and the prosecutrix had been solemnized, the prosecutrix did not wish to pursue the proceedings, and considering the circumstances, the court decided to quash the FIR and all proceedings arising from it.
Issues: The issues involved the resolution of the misunderstanding between the petitioner and the prosecutrix, the fact of their marriage, and the prosecutrix's decision not to pursue the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the marriage, compromise deed, and the prosecutrix's decision not to pursue the proceedings as grounds to quash the FIR and all related proceedings.
Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No. 330/2020, under Sections 376/506 IPC, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - Vide this petition, petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 330/2020, under Sections 376/506 IPC, registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, accepts notice and submits that petitioner and respondent No.2/ prosecutrix is present in the Court and she has been identified by SI Smriti Gupta, Investigating Officer of this case.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits the misunderstanding between petitioner and respondent No.2/prosecutrix has been resolved in terms of Compromise Deed dated 25.09.2020. He further submits that the marriage between petitioner and prosecutrix/respondent No.2 has been solemnized in Arya Samaj Mandir, Nakul Gali, Vishwas Nagar, Delhi on 25.09.2020 itself and they are happily living together as husband and wife. He next submits that respondent No.2/ prosecutrix does not wish to pursue the proceedings arising out of FIR in question and her affidavit dated 06.02.2021 to this effect is placed on record.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State on instructions from Investigating Officer of this case submits that the factum of marriage between petitioner and respondent No.2/prosecutrix stands verified.
6. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that to enable the parties to lead a happy married life, this petition deserves to be allowed.
7. In a somewhat similar circumstances, a Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court in CRM-M No.47266 of 2019, Pankaj @ Sikandar Kumar Vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and another, decided on 05.03.2020, while quashing the proceedings for the offences under Section 376 IPC, has observed as under:-
"5. In normal circumstances, the Court would not entertain a matter when the non compoundable offences are heinous in nature and against the public. In the instant case, the offence, complained of is under Section 376 IPC, which is an offence of grave nature. In the eyes of law, the offence of rape is serious and non-compoundable and the Courts should not in ordinary circumstances interfere and quash the FIR that has been registered. However, there are always exceptions to the normal rules and certain categories of cases, which deserve consideration specially when it is a case of love affair between teenagers and due to fear of the society and pressure from the community one party alleges rape, cases where the accused and the victim are well known to each other and allegation of rape is levelled only because the accused refused to marry, as well as the age, educational maturity and the mental capacity, consequences of the same ought to be kept in mind when inclined to interfere."
8. Although, as per the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Parbat Bhai Aahir and Ors. vs. State of Gujrat & Ors., (2017) AIR SC 4843, the FIR should not be quashed in case of rape as it is a heinous offence, but when complainant/prosecutrix herself takes the initiative and states that she made the complaint due to some misunderstanding and now wants to give quietus to the misunderstanding which arose between her and the petitioner, in my considered opinion, in such cases, there will be no purpose in continuing with the trial. Ultimately, if such direction is issued, the result will be of acquittal in favour of the accused, but substantial public time shall be wasted. A similar view was taken by this court in the case of Danish Ali v. State and Anr. in Crl. M.C. 1727/2019.
9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts and the fact that the petitioner and prosecutrix have already married on 25.09.2020, therefore, this Court is inclined to quash the present FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioner any further.
10. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 330/2020, under Sections 376/506 IPC, registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
11. The order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
The court can consider quashing FIR and related proceedings when the complainant/prosecutrix herself takes the initiative to resolve the misunderstanding and does not wish to pursue the proceedings, ....
The court may quash FIRs for non-compoundable offenses under specific circumstances where misunderstandings are resolved, particularly involving parties who have married post-complaint.
Court may quash FIR for serious offenses if complainant reconciles with the accused and expresses no desire to proceed, thereby conserving judicial resources.
The court may consider quashing the FIR and proceedings if the complainant/prosecutrix desires to withdraw the complaint and if there are exceptional circumstances, such as marriage between the accus....
FIR quashed - Offence of Rape - FIR should not be quashed in case of rape as it is a heinous offence, but when complainant/prosecutrix herself takes initiative and states that she wants to give quiet....
The reconciliation of the marriage, the birth of the child, and the complainant's desire to end the proceedings can be grounds for quashing the FIR and related proceedings.
Amicable settlement between parties - False promise to marry - Seeks quash of FIR - A breach of a promise cannot be said to be a false promise - To establish a false promise maker of promise should h....
The court quashed the FIR under Sections 323, 376, and 506 IPC based on the mutual consent of the parties after marriage, emphasizing the need to protect their marital relationship.
The court emphasized that heinous and serious offences like rape cannot be quashed solely based on compromise, but in cases where the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation o....
The court can quash FIRs in cases of alleged sexual offences if the complainant unequivocally expresses a desire to resolve disputes amicably after marriage, indicating no public interest in continui....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.