Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Aakash – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage reconciliation handles accusations. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's caution regarding quashing fir in heinous cases. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. quashing fir serves no useful purpose. (Para 9) |
| 4. fir is quashed and petition disposed. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. Petitioner are seeking quashing of FIR No. 450/2018, u/s 376/377/354(B)/365/342/323/34 IPC, registered at police station Sultanpuri, New Delhi in this petition.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 and respondent No2/ complainant of FIR in question, have been knowing each other and were in relationship but due to some misunderstanding, the FIR in question was registered by respondent No.2 against the petitioners. It is stated that during the course of investigation, petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 reconciled their misunderstanding and on 04.10.2020 they have married each other as per Hindu rites and since then, they are living happily together as husband and wife.
3. Notice issued.
4. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, who is the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
