SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Aashish Chandra Tiwary (Surg Lt Cdr) – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir for misunderstanding. (Para 1 , 9)
2. arguments regarding misunderstanding and marriage. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11)
3. legal precedents on false promise to marry. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. decision to quash fir based on lack of purpose. (Para 16)
5. final order to quash proceedings. (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide present petition, petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 95/2021, registered at police station Naraina, Delhi for the offence under Sections 376 (2) (n) IPC.

2. Notice issued.

3. Ms. Richa Kapoor, learned Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/State accepts notice.

4. Ms. Neha Rajpal, Advocate for respondent No.2, accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, who is the complainant of FIR in question, is present through video conferencing.

5. The Investigating Officer of this case is present through video conferencing and she has identified the complainant who is also present through video conferencing.

6. With the consent of both the sides, the present petition has been taken up for hearing and disposal.

7. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top