VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Ravi Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Prem Malhotra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral). - The present appeal is directed against the order dated 11.09.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting the appellant/ defendant's application being LA. No. 23748/2014 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The appellant has also assailed the order dated 05.10.2018 passed in Review Petition No. 383/2018, whereby the review sought by him against the order dated 11.09.2018 was also rejected.
2. The respondents/plaintiffs instituted a suit against the appellant/defendant to seek a decree for partition and permanent injunction in respect of property No. 17, Road No. 8, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi on the premise that the plaintiffs and the defendant are co-owners of the said property.
3. After the demise of their father, Late Shri Jaidev Malhotra, the plaintiffs are residing in USA and therefore, the suit has been instituted through their General Attorney. It has been averred in the plaint that the plaintiffs are in joint possession of the suit property which has, accordingly, been valued for purposes of court fee and jurisdiction. The appellant/defendant has filed his written statement, claiming therein that the plaintiffs, not being in possession of the suit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.