SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1828

VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Ravi Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Prem Malhotra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral). - The present appeal is directed against the order dated 11.09.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting the appellant/ defendant's application being LA. No. 23748/2014 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The appellant has also assailed the order dated 05.10.2018 passed in Review Petition No. 383/2018, whereby the review sought by him against the order dated 11.09.2018 was also rejected.

2. The respondents/plaintiffs instituted a suit against the appellant/defendant to seek a decree for partition and permanent injunction in respect of property No. 17, Road No. 8, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi on the premise that the plaintiffs and the defendant are co-owners of the said property.

3. After the demise of their father, Late Shri Jaidev Malhotra, the plaintiffs are residing in USA and therefore, the suit has been instituted through their General Attorney. It has been averred in the plaint that the plaintiffs are in joint possession of the suit property which has, accordingly, been valued for purposes of court fee and jurisdiction. The appellant/defendant has filed his written statement, claiming therein that the plaintiffs, not being in possession of the suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top