IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Yogesh Khanna, J.
Sahil Dahiya @ Tarun Dahiya - Appellant
Versus
State NCT Of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Application No. 1436 of 2020
Decided On : 07-01-2021
Regular Bail - Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Section 439 CrPC - Section 3/4 MCOCA
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail in a case under Section 3/4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) after being apprehended by the Delhi Police. The prosecution alleged the petitioner's involvement in an organized crime syndicate led by Parvesh Maan, including charges of murder and association with the syndicate.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's association with Parvesh Maan was prima facie established by call detail records (CDRs) and confessional statements of other accused. The court also noted the syndicate's history of engaging in organized crime, including murder and extortion, and the recovery of illegal weapons from their possession. The alleged retraction of the petitioner's confessional statement was deemed not genuine due to a long delay and lack of convincing reasons.
Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's association with the organized crime syndicate, the admissibility of confessional statements, and the potential risk of granting bail given the nature of the alleged crimes.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the prima facie evidence of the petitioner's association with the syndicate, the admissibility of confessional statements under Section 18 of MCOCA, and the seriousness of the alleged organized crime activities in denying the bail application.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitioner's application for bail, emphasizing that the pending trial should not be influenced by the court's observations.
JUDGMENT
Yogesh Khanna, J. - This petition is filed under Section 439 Criminal Procedure Code 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr P C) for seeking regular bail in case FIR No.207/2019 under Section 3/4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred as MCOCA) registered at police station Special Cell, Delhi Police.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued petitioner herein has been wrongly involved in MCOCA and though, perusal of the status report filed by the State shows there are three FIRs against petitioner; however, in FIR No.816/2014 under Section 302/34 IPC registered at police station Rohini North, Delhi the petitioner was granted bail by this Court per order dated 03.06.2015 and that time admittedly the accused had no association with Parvesh Maan. As regards the FIR No.226/2018 registered at police station Ashok Vihar, it is alleged though charge sheet has been filed against petitioner but there is no evidence of his association with the organized gang of Parvesh Maan. Further in FIR No. 291/2018 under Section 387 IPC PS K. N. Katju Marg, Delhi, the petitioner is not involved. It is also argued Annexure-I of status report reveals at least 40 persons associated to Parvesh Mann, then why the accused of FIR No.226/2018 are singled out.
3. It is further submitted whilst the petitioner was on interim bail in case FIR No.226/2018 he was apprehended by the Delhi Police and was involved in the present case FIR and arrested under the provisions of the MCOCA. It is also alleged the petitioner on 04.06.2020 had retracted from the confessional statement recorded under Section 18 of the MCOCA and such letter is annexed as annexure A to this petition.
4. However, the case of the prosecution is one Parvesh Maan @ Sagar the alleged the head of a syndicate, including the petitioner herein is running an organized crime syndicate and is continuously engaged in the unlawful activities for the purpose of pecuniary gain and other benefits. In the year 2018 the syndicate brutally murdered another notorious gangster Suryapraksh @ Babloo in the area of police station Ashok Vihar on 31.07.2018 to prove their supremacy of the gang in the area of Outer Delhi for creating the havoc and terror, hence, the present FIR was registered at the petitioner after obtaining the approval from the competent authority.
5. It is alleged in the last ten years, there are ten cases registered against Parvesh Maan, being head of the syndicate. The three FIRs viz FIR No.226/2018 under Section 302/34 IPC police station Ashok Vihar; FIR No.282/2018 under Section 387 IPC police station K N Katju Marg; and FIR No.291/2018 under Section 336/427 IPC and Section 25/27 Arms Act police station Maurya Enclave were registered against the gang members. It is alleged only the accused of FIRs of 2018 have been made accused in present FIR as these FIRs are recent and hence their association with accused Parvesh Maan is recent.
6. During the course of investigation, petitioner Sahil Dahiya was arrested on 21.01.2020 and PC remand was taken on 29.01.2020. Confessional statement of Sahil as per the provisions of Section 18 of MCOCA was got recorded on 06.02.2020 by the competent authority i.e. DCP and after that he was produced before the CMM on 06.02.2020.
7. Later, four accused persons namely Ajay Mann, Sachin Mann, Yudhveer Maan including syndicate Pravesh Maan were also arrested in this case and their confessional statements were recorded as per the provision of section 18 of MCOCA before the competent authority i.e. DCP. Confessional statement of Syndicate/gangster Pravesh Maan was got recorded by DCP on 01.04.2020 who disclosed about involvements of his gang members, including of the petitioner Sahil Dahiya and others. He stated he along with the petitioner Sahil Dahiya, Sachin Maan, Sonu Maan @ Chand, Praveen @ Gaurav Tyagi committed murder of one Surya Prakash @ Babloo in Ashok Vihar on 30.07.2018.
8. As per record all the conditions for recording
Prima facie evidence of association with an organized crime syndicate, admissibility of confessional statements under MCOCA, and the seriousness of alleged organized crime activities influenced the c....
The court affirmed that involvement in an organized crime syndicate justifies stringent bail denials, emphasized by the presence of multiple charges and confessions from co-accused.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to strictly construe the provisions of MCOCA, establish the mens rea, and consider the length of the period spent in custody and the unlik....
The court's decision emphasized the interpretation of MCOCA provisions and the satisfaction of bail conditions under Section 21(4) of MCOCA.
The court held that the evidence presented indicates substantial involvement of the applicant in a murder conspiracy linked to organized crime, justifying denial of bail under MCOCA.
The MCOC Act can be applied to individuals involved in organized crime based on their nexus with a crime syndicate, even if they are implicated in a single case, provided there is sufficient evidence....
Prolonged detention without trial must be balanced against stringent bail conditions, recognizing the fundamental right to a speedy trial.
The main legal point established is the requirement to establish a prima facie nexus between past crimes and the present crime to invoke the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.