SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1167

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AMIT BORKAR
Amit Madhukar Bhogle – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sana Raees Khan, Sumit Sharma, Vidya Lohamate, Neha Balani, Dipti Jadhav, Divya Parab
For the Respondents: Veera Shinde, Chandrakant Jadhav, Rajashree Balgi

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

AMIT BORKAR, J.

1. By the present application filed under Section 4 39 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant is seeking his release on regular bail in connection with Crime Register No. 89 of 2021 registered with D.C.B./C.I.D. Unit 7, Mumbai. The offences alleged against the applicant are of a serious nature and are punishable under Sections 3 02 , 326, 342, 144, 148, 149, 506 and 120-B read with Section 3 4 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860. In addition, offences under Sections 3 7(1)(a) and 135 of the MAHARASHTRA POLICE ACT , Sections 3 , 4 and 25 of the ARMS ACT , an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top