VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Dharmender Joshi – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. - The petitioners state that they are working at different levels of the High Court Establishment and belong to the cadre of Administrative Officers (Judicial)/Superintendents (hereafter also referred to as 'AOJ') and cadre of Court Masters (hereafter also referred to as 'CM'). The respondent nos. 2 to 84 are employed by this Court's Establishment as Private Secretaries (hereafter also referred to as 'PS'). The cadre of PS, AOJs and CM are feeder cadres for the post of Assistant Registrar (hereafter also referred to as 'AR').
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the ratio of 3:4 between the PS cadre and CM plus AOJ cadre, for promotion to the level of an Assistant Registrar (AR).
3. The post of AR is a selection post. The Delhi High Court (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1972 were amended by a Notification dated 15.10.2007 to provide for the allocation of vacancies arising in the post of Assistant Registrar in the said ratio of 3:4 between the cadres (3 for the PS Cadre and 4 for the AOJ plus CM Cadre). Prior to the said notification, the quota for promotion to the post of Assistant Registrar inter se PS cadre and AOJ plus CM cadre was 1:2. The p
Dwarka Prasad & Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) &Ors. : (2003) 6 SCC 535
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.