JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails order dated 10th December 2021, passed by the learned Additional District Judge ('the learned ADJ') in CS DJ ADJ 15466/2016  (Raj Rani & Anr. v. Sumitra Parashar & Anr.), which reads as under:

'CS DJ ADJ 15466/16

RAJ RANI vs. SUMITRA PRASAR

10.12.2021

Present:          Sh. Rahul Hans, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.

Ms. Amrit Kaur, Ld. Counsel for defendant along with defendant.

Fresh Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of plaintiff. Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff requested for one more opportunity to examine the witness stating that plaintiff has engaged new Counsel recently. Request of the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff is opposed by Ld. Counsel for defendant stating that plaintiff is deliberately lingering on the matter. Ld. Counsel for defendant also relied her objection upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 7532 of 2011 titled as "Shiv Cotex Vs. Tirgun Auto Plast Private Limited And Others."

I have considered the submissions. Perusal of file reveals that so many opportunities have already been granted to plaintiff to complete PE. On previous date, the cost was also i