IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma - Respondent
FAO 36 of 2021, CM Appls. 2914 of 2021, 10442 of 2021, 10444 of 2021, 20904 of 2021, 23819 of 2021, 25868 of 2021, 25869 of 2021, 25870 of 2021, 25884 of 2021, 25885 of 2021, 26495 of 2021, 29121 of 2021, 38063 of 2021, 38289 of 2021, 39643 of 2021, 43944-46 of 2021, 3172 of 2022, 3455 of 2022, 5641 of 2022, 5642 of 2022, 5803 of 2022, 5865 of 2022, 7745 of 2022, 13472 of 2022, 16153 of 2022, 17039 of 2022, 18207 of 2022, 18247 of 2022, 18248 of 2022, 21768 of 2022, 21801 of 2022, 21802 of 2022, 21803 of 2022, 22125 of 2022, 23093 of 2022
Decided On : 01-06-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. kalkaji mandir related matters under consideration. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding compliance and direction adherence. (Para 4 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. fire safety measures implemented post-incident. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. rights of pujaris in relation to the land usage. (Para 19 , 21 , 24) |
| 5. pujaris cannot claim individual rights over temple land. (Para 26 , 38) |
| 6. final decision on occupancy and shop allotment. (Para 44 , 45) |
| 7. administrative decisions regarding fair organization and fund management. (Para 56 , 58) |
ORDER
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral). - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. At the outset, the Minutes of the Meeting dated 30th May, 2022 submitted by the ld. Administrator has been perused by this Court. The said Minutes deal with various aspects relating to the Kalkaji Mandir. As per the said Minutes, Mahant Shri Surender Nath is stated to be the current baridaar. The said Minutes record that there has been non-compliance of the directions issued by the ld. Administrator in respect of arranging qualified pandits for distributing prasad and providing other services in the bhawan, the pandits following a uniform dress code, as also, non-compliance of directions regarding recycling of prasad. The relevant portion of the Minutes of the Meeting dated 30th May, 2022 is set out below:
D. Non-compliance of the direction dated 23.05.2022 regarding entry of Pandits only in the Temple
13. In the meeting dated 23.05.2022, the Baridaar, i.e. the Mahant was directed to arrange for qualified Pandits to give prashad and provide other services inside the Bhawan with effect from 30.05.2022. However, the direction has not yet been complied with. The Mahant has sought a review of the decision taken in this regard.
14 An inspection of the Bhawan was carried out by the undersigned and videos/ photographs were taken of the persons present inside the Bhawan. The undersigned has reconsidered the request of the Mahant for review of the decision and reiterates the decision taken in the meeting dated 23.05.2022. The reason for reiterating the said decision is that in all Temples and religious places, the services are performed by qualified pandits only and there is no reason to deviate from the well-established universal practice all over the country. It is further directed that the said pandits shall follow a uniform dress code, to be approved by the undersigned. The said decision is to be communicated to the Mahant.
E. Non-compliance of the direction regarding recycling of the prashud
15. The direction dated 23.05.2022 to return the prashad (nariyal, chunni and other items) to the devotees to stop re-cycling of the prashad has still not been complied with by the present baridaar. i.e. the Mahant
16. The Mahant, has once again been requested to return the prashad to the devotees either inside the Temple, or by at the exit gate of the Mandir, by putting an additional point at the exit gate, with immediate effect. The Mahant assured to do the needful without delay.
4. Mr. Aly Mirza and Mr. Prabhash Chander, Id. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Mahant submit that the Mahant has been adhering to the directions issued by the ld. Administrator and has been rendering complete cooperation to the ld. Administrator. Ld. Counsels submit that insofar as the puja sewa and other rituals being performed are concerned, the practice of the same being conducted by pujaris who are qualified Pandits shall continue. However, insofar as the other voluntary work including distribution of prasad and providing of other services is concerned, the same can be permitted to be performed by the volunteers, so long as they are suited to serve in a Mandir, their credentials are verified in terms of their background and they follow a uniform dress code, for the purposes of identification. This stand of the Mahant is also supported by t
Pujaris lack individual rights to use temple-owned properties for personal gain as determined by past decrees, emphasizing their role for temple service amidst mandated redevelopment.
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The court ruled on the necessity of redevelopment of temple premises while ensuring the rights of pujaris and addressing grievances of unauthorized occupants.
Court emphasizes proactive measures against encroachment on religious premises, directing authorities to erect a boundary wall and manage shopkeeper licenses to ensure compliance and community welfar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments and address concerns related to the redevelopment of the K....
Eviction of unauthorized occupants from temple premises is upheld while ensuring rehabilitation under specific schemes, and rights of female heirs to offerings and puja sewa require future adjudicati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to direct eviction and provide rehabilitation options for unauthorized occupants, emphasizing the need for expedited imp....
Court ensures participatory redevelopment process for community stakeholders while directing eviction of unauthorized occupants and considering rehabilitation under public housing schemes.
Court upheld the necessity of lawful eviction of unauthorized occupants to ensure redevelopment while facilitating temporary arrangements for vendors during religious events.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between unauthorized occupants of religious premises and normal tenants, and the state's obligation to provide alternative accommod....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.