Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. kalkaji mandir related matters under consideration. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding compliance and direction adherence. (Para 4 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. fire safety measures implemented post-incident. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. rights of pujaris in relation to the land usage. (Para 19 , 21 , 24) |
| 5. pujaris cannot claim individual rights over temple land. (Para 26 , 38) |
| 6. final decision on occupancy and shop allotment. (Para 44 , 45) |
| 7. administrative decisions regarding fair organization and fund management. (Para 56 , 58) |
ORDER
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral). - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. At the outset, the Minutes of the Meeting dated 30th May, 2022 submitted by the ld. Administrator has been perused by this Court. The said Minutes deal with various aspects relating to the Kalkaji Mandir. As per the said Minutes, Mahant Shri Surender Nath is stated to be the current baridaar. The said Minutes record that there has been non-compliance of the directions issued by the ld. Administrator in respect of arranging qualified pandits for distributin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
