Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment of assistant to administrator (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. support for redevelopment of kalkaji mandir (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. report on temporary shops (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. payment for flats and rehabilitation of jhuggi dwellers (Para 14 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. eviction of unauthorized occupants (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. hearing and undertakings in civil suit (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. listing of matters for future hearing (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. Vide previous order dated 27th September, 2021, Ms. Manmeet Arora was appointed as Assistant to the ld. Administrator. The relevant paragraph of the said order is set out below:
"107. The ld. Administrator shall be assisted by Ms. Manmeet Arora, who has been appointed as the Local Commissioner by this Court in these cases, from time to time, and has submitted various reports on the condition of the Kalkaji Mandir. The ld. Administrator may appoint a Secretary-cum Treasurer to assist him in carrying
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of accommodating the interests of pujaris and baridaars in the redevelopment process and ensuring their active participation.
The court ruled on the necessity of redevelopment of temple premises while ensuring the rights of pujaris and addressing grievances of unauthorized occupants.
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
Unauthorized occupation of religious premises is illegal; the Court mandates removal to ensure redevelopement for public safety.
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The court established that unlawful occupants of public premises must be evicted for safety during religious gatherings, ensuring proper relocation options are provided yet not favoring unauthorized ....
Eviction of unauthorized occupants from temple premises is upheld while ensuring rehabilitation under specific schemes, and rights of female heirs to offerings and puja sewa require future adjudicati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to direct eviction and provide rehabilitation options for unauthorized occupants, emphasizing the need for expedited imp....
Applicants are directed to send their representations to the DDA and DUSIB collectively, so that a decision can be taken in this regard by the said authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
