Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of matters concerning kalkaji mandir. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. supreme court orders related to redevelopment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. integration of baridaars' suggestions into redevelopment plan. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. management of crowd control during high footfall periods. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 5. regulations on shop allotments and refund processes. (Para 57 , 58 , 66) |
| 6. accountability for financial contributions by baridaars. (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
| 7. decision-making on vip pass distributions. (Para 79 , 80 , 81) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. Today, the ld. Administrator has placed on record Report No.8 dated 7th September, 2022 (hereinafter, "Report No.8"), in respect of redevelopment of the Kalkaji Mandir and other issues.
Redevelopment of the Kalkaji Mandir premises
4. The redevelopment of the Kalkaji Mandir has been considered from time to time, in these matters as also in appeals and SLPs arising therefrom. Vide order dated 27th September,
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for ongoing progress in the demarcation process, proper placement of street vendors, resolution of redevelopment issues, and conducting a ....
Pujaris lack individual rights to use temple-owned properties for personal gain as determined by past decrees, emphasizing their role for temple service amidst mandated redevelopment.
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
Court emphasizes proactive measures against encroachment on religious premises, directing authorities to erect a boundary wall and manage shopkeeper licenses to ensure compliance and community welfar....
The court ruled on the necessity of redevelopment of temple premises while ensuring the rights of pujaris and addressing grievances of unauthorized occupants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments and address concerns related to the redevelopment of the K....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to regulate and manage the premises of the Kalkaji Mandir, including the fixation of tehbazari amounts for shops and the appo....
Court ensures participatory redevelopment process for community stakeholders while directing eviction of unauthorized occupants and considering rehabilitation under public housing schemes.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of accommodating the interests of pujaris and baridaars in the redevelopment process and ensuring their active participation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
