SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Neeta Bhardwaj - Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma - Respondent
FAO 36 of 2021 & CM Appls. 2914 of 2021, 10442 of 2021, 10444 of 2021, 20904 of 2021, 23819 of 2021, 25868 of 2021, 25869 of 2021, 25870 of 2021, 25884 of 2021, 25885 of 2021, 26495 of 2021, 29121 of 2021, 38063 of 2021, 38289 of 2021, 39643 of 2021, 4394
Decided On : 25-04-2022




Court emphasizes proactive measures against encroachment on religious premises, directing authorities to erect a boundary wall and manage shopkeeper licenses to ensure compliance and community welfare.

Headnote:(A) Encroachment Law - Prevention of unauthorized occupation - Administrative Order for construction of boundary wall for Kalkaji Mandir premises to prevent encroachment is upheld. Court directs authorities to cooperate in the erection of barricades to secure the land after issuing an amount of Rs.10 lakhs for this purpose, further allowing construction of temporary shops for verified shopkeepers. (Paras 3-6, 10, 13-15, 28)

(B) Regulatory Oversight - Role of local authorities and police - Compliance from SDMC and Delhi Police is emphasized for monitoring encroachment and aiding construction efforts. Court mandates reports on vendor licenses and monitoring of boundary maintenance. (Paras 10, 18, 31)

(C) Financial Management - Baridaars directed to contribute towards maintenance and cleanliness of the Mandir premises with specific monthly deposit amounts highlighted, with failure to comply resulting in restrictions on puja activities. (Paras 31-34)

(D) Organisational Structuring - Establishment of cooperative frameworks for shopkeepers and pujaris, recognizing claims for temporary shops based on prior occupancy, binding deposits for future applications were instituted. (Paras 13, 14, 31)

Findings of Court:
The court underscored the necessity of protecting community and religious interests by erecting barricades and managing vendor activities appropriately.

Result: Directions issued for immediate compliance with the orders and a follow-up hearing scheduled.

Table of Content
1. concerns about encroachments on kalkaji mandir land. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. recommendations and directives for boundary wall erection. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. allocation of temporary shops to verified shopkeepers. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
4. bidding process for larger shop allotments. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. regulations for temporary stalls during navratras. (Para 22 , 23)
6. discussions on baridaars and illegal occupants. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
7. redevelopment of the kalkaji mandir and administrative report. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
8. financial obligations of baridaars towards mandir maintenance. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
9. scheduling and procedural directives for future compliance. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.

3. Today the ld. Administrator's Fifth Report dated 23rd April, 2022 (hereinafter "Report No.5"), has been received. Report No.5 raises various concerns and provides recommendations in respect of the same.

Erection of Boundary Wall to Prevent Encroachments

4. Before proceeding further, this Court notices that there are concerns expressed about continuous encroachment into the Kalkaji Mandir premises, as also into the land which is adjacent to the Mandir area, some of which may also be Government land.

5. The entire process of redevelopment of the Kalkaji Mandir would be severely jeopardized if encroachments happen on a daily basis either by vendors or any other unauthorized occupants. Accordingly, it is deemed appropriate to secure the entire land surrounding the Kalkaji Mandir premises, being used for the activities of the Mandir, by erection of a barricade or a boundary wall for safeguarding the entire land.

6. Mr. Chauhan, ld. Architect is present virtually and submits that in some areas there was barbed wire fencing, however the same has been removed by encroachers. Mr. Chauhan recommends that metal sheet fencing can be done of the entire land so as to avoid continuous encroachments. Accordingly, in order to ensure that such occurrences of encroachments do not happen on a daily basis, it is directed as under:

(i) Ld. Architect along with his team shall take immediate steps for erection of metal sheet barricade or any other type of barricades/boundary that he deems appropriate, which is not easily removable, for fencing the entire land around the Kalkaji Mandir, which is being used for activities of the Mandir.

(ii) For the said purpose, the concerned Tehsildar and/or revenue authorities as also the PWD officials and DDA officials shall render all necessary cooperation.

(iii) Once the entire land is barricaded, the revenue authorities and other DDA/SDMC/concerned officials may commence the demarcation process to separate the Government land and other Kalkaji Mandir premises land/the land claimed to be belonging to the Thok Jogians and Thok Brahamins.

7. A sum of Rs.10 lakhs is directed to be released to the ld. Architect from the "Registrar General, Delhi High Court, A/c Kalkaji Mandir Fund" vide A/c No.15530110155950 IFSC Code UCBA0001553] (hereinafter "Kalkaji Mandir Fund"), for the purposes of erecting the boundary wall/barricades in terms of the above order.

8. The Delhi Police through SHO Kalkaji - Sh. Balbir Singh who is present in Court, has assured the Court that the boundary wall erected either through metal sheets or any other form of barricading shall be regularly monitored, so as to ensure that no unauthorized occupation or encroachment takes place into the Kalkaji Mandir premises.

9. During the process of erection of barricading and boundary wall, the SHO, Kalkaji shall also provide requisite police assistance to the ld. Architect and the ld. Administrator, to ensure smooth erection of the same.

Shops/Vendors on the periphery of the Kalkaji Mandir premises

10.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top