SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent


Table of Content
1. concerns about encroachments on kalkaji mandir land. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. recommendations and directives for boundary wall erection. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. allocation of temporary shops to verified shopkeepers. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
4. bidding process for larger shop allotments. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. regulations for temporary stalls during navratras. (Para 22 , 23)
6. discussions on baridaars and illegal occupants. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
7. redevelopment of the kalkaji mandir and administrative report. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
8. financial obligations of baridaars towards mandir maintenance. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
9. scheduling and procedural directives for future compliance. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.

3. Today the ld. Administrator's Fifth Report dated 23rd April, 2022 (hereinafter "Report No.5"), has been received. Report No.5 raises various concerns and provides recommendations in respect of the same.

Erection of Boundary Wall to Prevent E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top