SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 933

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Krishnan Subramanian - Appellant
Versus
State Of NCT Of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 679/2022
Decided On : 10-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Mr. Saud Khan, Mr. Prabhav Ralle & Mr. Kartik Venu, Advocates, for the Applicant; Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for State with Mr. Karan Dhalla & Ms. Mizba Dhebar, Advocates. & Insp. Manoj Kumar, P.S. EOW, for the Respondent; Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate. with Mr. Sandeep D. Das, Mr. Shashwat Sarin & Mr. Harsh Gautam, Advocates, for the complainant

The decision emphasized the importance of considering the nature of evidence, severity of accusations, and risk factors when granting bail in criminal cases.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Regular Bail - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 409/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought regular bail in a case involving allegations of financial irregularities and wrongful loss to a company. The applicant argued that he had no involvement in the alleged activities and that the investigation did not implicate him. The State opposed the bail application, alleging the applicant's involvement in fraudulent activities.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the severity of the accusations, the nature of the evidence, and the bail orders of co-accused individuals. It found that the evidence against the applicant was documentary in nature and that there was no risk of flight or tampering with evidence. The court granted the bail application, imposing specific conditions on the applicant.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the severity of the accusations, the nature of the evidence, and the risk of flight or tampering with evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the documentary nature of the evidence, the bail orders of co-accused individuals, and the lack of risk associated with granting bail to the applicant.

Final Decision: The court granted the bail application, subject to specific conditions, and directed the release of the applicant on bail.

JUDGMENT

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. - The instant bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR bearing No. 50/2019 registered at Police Station EOW Mandir Marg for offences punishable under Sections 409/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Status report filed by the State is taken on record.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the aforesaid FIR was lodged by M/s. Religare Finvest Limited (hereinafter 'RFL' - New Management) with Police Station EOW Mandir Marg against Malvinder Mohan Singh, Shivinder Mohan Singh, the then Promoters/Directors, Sunil Godhwani, the then Chairman-cum-Managing Director and N.K. Ghoshal. It is alleged that the aforesaid persons having absolute control on REL, and its subsidiaries have put 'RFL' in poor financial condition by disbursing loans to entities, having no financial standings. These entities willfully defaulted in repayments and caused wrongful loss to 'RFL' to the huge money. The Reserve Bank of India (hereinafter 'RBI') has pointed out some discrepancies in its analysis viz. the top borrowers of 'RFL', under Corporate Loan Book (CLB) portfolio were related entities; there was inter linkage between the borrowers as funds were routed from one borrower to another; and the loan amounts ultimately were coming to the group companies of 'RFL'.

4. Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submitted that as per the allegations made in the complaint and crystallized in the charge-sheet, the promoter-directors were involved in round tripping of some loans right from the year 2008 onwards and it is a matter of admitted position that the aforesaid round tripping predominantly took place between the period from 2008 to 2016, during which period the applicant was neither a part of 'REL' nor a part of 'RFL'. It is further submitted that 'RFL' was a 100% subsidiary of 'REL' and therefore, a common balance sheet was being filed. The applicant throughout his limited tenure as Group CFO of 'RFL', worked strictly under the guidance and directions of the Board of Directors. It is vehemently submitted that the applicant at no point of time held a key role so far as management of affairs of 'REL' or 'RFL' is concerned. The applicant sought to resign from RFL/REL on 14th November 2018 and the resignation attained force on 11th March 2019 after obtaining the requisite clearances from the RBI.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that during the course of further investigation one Maninder Singh who was working as Chief Business Officer of 'REL' as well as held vital post in 'RFL', was arrested by the investigating authorities on 27th October 2020 on the allegation that he had aided and abetted and being an accessory/criminal conspirator with the main beneficiaries i.e. Shivinder Mohan Singh and Malvinder Mohan Singh and thereby had caused loss of more than Rs. 1500 Crores to 'RFL'. The allegation against him was that he was a member of Risk Management Committee (hereinafter 'RMC') and about 13 dubious loans were granted to related parties without any documentation/collateral securities, whereas the co-accused Maninder Singh had a huge responsibility in refusing to permit/sanction or support the grant of such loans, being a member of the 'RMC'.

6. The investigating agencies conducted detailed investigation and consequently filed a chargesheet dated 6th January 2020, before the CMM, Saket, District Court, New Delhi. It was submitted that on account of fact that no evidence surfaced to the detriment of the applicant during the aforesaid investigation as comprehensively conducted by Economic Offences Wing (hereinafter 'EOW'), therefore, the applicant was neither arraigned nor charge sheeted by the respondent.

7. The supplementary chargesheet under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. was filed by the Investigating Authorities qua the co-accused Maninder Singh on 20th January 2021.

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top