IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J.
Kavi Arora – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Bail Appln. 1059 of 2022 & Cr.M.A. 6244 of 2022
Decided On : 02-06-2023
The court granted bail to the applicant, who was accused of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and forgery in connection with a financial fraud case involving Religare Finvest Limited (RFL). The court considered the gravity of the offenses, the applicant's role in the alleged conspiracy, the stage of the investigation, the nature of the evidence, and the applicant's personal circumstances. The court also took into account the fact that other co-accused persons had been granted bail and that the applicant had not attempted to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence while on interim bail.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested on 10.10.2019 and was released on interim bail on 14.01.2021. While on interim bail, the applicant moved an application for regular bail and the interim bail granted to him was extended till 01.03.2021. On 09.04.2021, the learned ASJ passed an order to the effect that the application under Section 439 will be heard only if the applicant surrenders. The said order was challenged before this Court in W.P.(CRL.) 834/2021 and was set aside on 13.04.2021. His interim bail was extended till 16.04.2021. Thereafter, the interim bail granted to the applicant was extended till 16.07.2021 by a full bench of this Court vide order dated 20.04.2021. In view of the aforesaid order of the full bench, the learned ASJ extended interim bail till 16.07.2021 vide order dated 22.04.2021. The said order of the learned ASJ dated 22.04.2021 was challenged by the complainant company and the challenge was dismissed. Thereafter, it was submitted that the application for regular bail moved on behalf of the applicant was pending and the interim bail granted to him was extended from time to time. Finally, on 02.04.2022, the learned ASJ, while dismissing the application for regular bail, directed the latter to surrender on or before 06.04.2022. The present application was filed and vide an order dated 05.04.2022, a coordinate bench extended the interim bail granted to the applicant. The said order was never challenged by the State or the complainant company and the applicant continues to remain in interim bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant was not required by the Investigating Officer for any further investigation as he was not served with any notice to join the investigation from the date on which he was sent to judicial custody, i.e., 14.10.2019 till the date of filing of the supplementary chargesheet on 15.12.2021. The court also found that the applicant had not attempted to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence while on interim bail and that he had complied with all the conditions imposed on him by the court.
Issues: 1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail.2. Whether the gravity of the offenses is a factor to be considered in granting bail.3. Whether the stage of the investigation is a factor to be considered in granting bail.4. Whether the nature of the evidence is a factor to be considered in granting bail.5. Whether the applicant's personal circumstances are a factor to be considered in granting bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the gravity of the offenses is a factor to be considered in granting bail, but it is not the only factor. The court also held that the stage of the investigation, the nature of the evidence, and the applicant's personal circumstances are all factors to be considered in granting bail. The court further held that the applicant had not attempted to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence while on interim bail and that he had complied with all the conditions imposed on him by the court. The court therefore granted the applicant regular bail.
Final Decision: The court granted the applicant regular bail upon his furnishing a fresh personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,00,000/-alongwith two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/Link Court, further subject to the following conditions: i. The memo of parties shows that the applicant is residing at 356, Escape Nirvana Country, Sector 50, Gurugram, Haryana -122018. In case of any change of address, the applicant is directed to inform the same to the Investigating Officer. ii. The applicant shall not leave India without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. iii. The applicant is directed to give all his mobile numbers to the Investigating Officer and keep them operational at all times. iv. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, tamper with evidence or try to influence the witness in any manner. v. In case it is established that the applicant tried to tamper with the evidence, the bail granted to the applicant shall stand cancelled forthwith.
JUDGMENT
Amit Sharma, J.
1. The present application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`CrPC') seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 50/2019 dated 27.03.2019, under Sections 420/409/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (`IPC') registered at PS Economic Offences Wing.
1.1. By separate judgments of the same date, this Court has disposed of applications seeking regular bail filed on behalf of the other co-accused in the present FIR -Sunil Naraindas Godhwani (BAIL APPLN. 1005/2022), Kavi Arora (BAIL APPLN. 1059/2022) and Rajender Aggarwal (BAIL APPLN. 1384/2021).
Factual Background
2. The FIR in the present case was registered upon a complaint received from Mr. Manpreet Singh Suri, Authorized Representative of Religare Finvest Limited (`RFL') alleging a financial fraud perpetrated by the promoters of Religare Enterprises Limited (`REL') -Shivinder Mohan Singh and Malvinder Mohan Singh, the then Chairman-cum-Managing Director - Sunil Godhwani and Narendra Kumar Ghoushal.
2.1. RFL is a company registered with the Reserve Bank of India (`RBI') and is licensed to undertake the business of financial services as a Non- Banking Financial Company (`NBFC'). It operates as an NBFC focused on financing small and medium enterprises (`SME') and extends SME working capital loans, secure SME business expansions, loans, short term trade finance and other loans to various entities. The complainant company is a subsidiary of REL which is a public company listed on the stock exchange. The majority shareholding of REL was owned by Malvinder Mohan Singh and Shivinder Mohan Singh till June, 2017, i.e., till when they were classified as promoters of REL. Thereafter, till February 2018, they remained on the Board of Directors of REL. Effectively, since Malvinder Mohan Singh and Shivinder Mohan Singh had control over REL, they also had control over its subsidiary RFL, the complainant company. Shivinder Mohan Singh held the position of Non-Executive Director of REL from 13.12.2004 till 06.04.2010 and thereafter, he held the position of Non-Executive Director and Vice-Chairman of REL from 29.07.2016 till 14.02.2018. Malvinder Mohan Singh, held the position of Non-Executive Chairman of REL from 13.12.2004 till 06.04.2010 and thereafter, from 29.07.2016 till 14.02.2018.
2.2. The shareholding and Board of REL was reconstituted in the year 2018 after Shivinder Mohan Singh and Malvinder Mohan Singh lost control pursuant to invocation of shares pledged by them with various banks in February 2018. After the said reconstitution, the new management conducted internal enquiries and discovered willful defaults on significant unsecured loans, defined for internal purposes as the Corporate Loan Book (`CLB'), by borrower entities, either related, controlled or associated with the promoters, all of who had been provided the subject loans from RFL on a non-arms' length basis. The primary allegation in the present case is that Sunil Godhwani, in conspiracy with Malvinder Mohan Singh and Shivinder Mohan Singh caused RFL to give unsecured loans to the tune of Rs. 2,397 Crores, on a non-arms' length basis and without proper documentation, to shell companies related to them and these entities, willfully defaulted in making the repayments. As on the date of the FIR, i.e., 27.03.2019, nineteen such entities were identified which had defaulted on their borrowings from RFL.
2.3. Enquiries further brought to light that the Securities Exchange Board of India (`SEBI') and the Serious Fraud Investigations Office (`SFIO') were already investigating the transactions involving REL and related entities. A review of the records revealed that the RBI had, from time to time, expressed concerns about the CLB portfolio of RFL. However, these concerns were allegedly never addressed by the promoters. The RBI had raised concerns about the promoters disbursing high value unsecured loans to entities with no financial standing. In its inspection report dated 06.01.2012, the RBI ha
The judgment emphasizes the importance of balancing personal liberty with the security of the community and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
Grant of Bail - Jurisdiction to grant bail must be exercised on the basis of the well-settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case.
Bail may be denied in serious economic offences if the accused poses a risk of tampering with evidence and if public money is involved. Court must ensure proper application of mind during bail decisi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception, and the gravity of the offence is an aspect to be kept in view by the Court. The c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the gravity of economic offences and the documentary nature of evidence should be considered while deciding bail applications, and deprivation....
The main legal point established is that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and the decision to grant bail should consider the seriousness of the charge and the severity of the punishment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.