Back
VIBHU BAKHRU
Director General Central Reserve Police Force – Appellant
Versus
Fibroplast Marine Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the arbitration agreement and disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 2. arguments against the arbitral award and its quantifications. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. court observations regarding delay, merits, and errors in the arbitral award. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 46 , 48 , 52 , 59 , 63 , 67) |
| 4. legal standards for reviewing arbitral awards and its implications. (Para 45 , 72 , 74 , 76) |
| 5. conclusion on setting aside the arbitral award and further proceedings. (Para 78 , 79) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. - The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter the 'a&C act') impugning an arbitral award dated 31.05.2019 (hereafter the 'impugned award') rendered by an arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole arbitrator (hereafter the 'arbitral Tribunal').
2. On 17.07.2008, the petitioner floated a tender bearing no. U.II.708(a)/2008-09-PROC-(NDRF) inviting bids for supply of 288 numbers of Boat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
