IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Sudhir Kumar Jain, JJ.
Md. Abdul Ahad Azim - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 6679 of 2022
Decided On : 27-04-2022
Recruitment Rules - Eligibility Criteria - Recruitment Rules of 2010 - [Constable (Tradesmen) (Group 'C' Post)] - [6th Pay Commission, Recruitment Rules of 2010] - The court discussed the implications of the 6th Pay Commission's recommendation to abolish the cadre of 'Followers' (Group 'D') and the subsequent conversion of Group 'D' posts into Group 'C' posts. The court also highlighted the eligibility criteria under the Recruitment Rules of 2010, including ITI/experience certificate and height requirements.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought quashing of an impugned letter declaring the petitioner ineligible for recruitment under the new Recruitment Rules, 2010 of Constable (Tradesmen) (Group 'C' Post) and directions for issuance of the joining letter to the petitioner on the post of Follower Group 'D' post (Washermen) to which he was already selected in the recruitment process of October, 2008.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no merit in the petitioner's petition and dismissed it on the grounds of delay and lack of merit.
Issues: The issues included the eligibility of the petitioner under the Recruitment Rules of 2010, the application of the 2010 rules to the 2008 recruitment process, and the delay in filing the petition.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that the petitioner's challenge to the Recruitment Rules of 2010, despite being selected in the 2008 recruitment process, lacked merit. The court also noted the delay in filing the petition as a factor in its decision.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed on the grounds of delay and lack of merit.
JUDGMENT
CM aPPL. 20280/2022 (exemption)
1. The application is allowed, with a direction to the applicant to file requisite certified copies/typed copies and annexures with proper margins within four weeks.
2. The application is accordingly disposed of.
W.P.(C) 6679/2022
3. Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of impugned letter dated 30.08.2018 issued by the respondent authority declaring the petitioner ineligible for recruitment under the new Recruitment Rules, 2010 of Constable (Tradesmen) (Group 'C' Post); directions to the respondents for issuance of the joining letter to the petitioner on the post of Follower Group 'D' post (Washermen) to which he was already selected in the recruitment process of October, 2008 which now stands merged with Group 'C' posts.
4. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was selected to the post of enrolled Follower (Group 'D' posts) (Washerman) in the recruitment process of October, 2008. Thereafter, vide order dated 29.10.2009 issued by Ministry of Home affairs, Government of India declared as under:
'6th Pay Commission in its report vide recommendation in para 7.19.45 recommended that all the posts in CPMFs should be combatised like the position existing in the Defence Forces. The Commission, accordingly, recommended abolition of the cadre of Followers. The Commission further recommended that any further recruitment in the grade of Followers should cease immediately. The existing Followers should initially be placed in the -1S pay band (separately being recommended by the Commission for all Group D categories till the time they are re-deployed in the Group C posts). Proper training should be given to make them combatised and on successful completion of such training, they should be absorbed in the grade of combatant Constables against regular vacancies. The Commission finally recommended that all non essential jobs that can be done by outsiders without any operational problems but are presently being done by Followers, should henceforth be contracted out or outsourced. The above recommendation was accepted by the Government.
2. Keeping in view the operation problems in outsourcing the jobs presently being done by the Followers, the proposal for continuation of the Cadre of Followers in CPMFs has been reconsidered by the Government and the following decisions have now been taken in the matter:-
i) all posts of Followers/other Gr. D posts in CPMFs may be converted into Group C posts and be placed in PB-I with grade pay of Rs.2000/-.
ii) after conversion of posts as proposed above the posts may be designated as Rifleman (name of trade) in case of assam Rifles and Constable (name of trade) in case of other CPMFs, as for example Constable (Carpenter), Constable (Cook) etc.
iii) RRs will be modified to make recruitment in each trade and for such posts will have no linkage with the RRs for the post of Constable/ General Duty and Constable/ Driver.
iv) There will be no change in the total sanctioned strength of Battalion/ Company due to conversion of the posts of Followers in / as Gr. C posts.
v) CPFs will submit the proposals for sanctioning of posts in the grade of Constable (Name of trade) against the posts which had been excluded earlier, while sanctioning other posts, on account of the recommendations of the 6th CPC for the abolition of the posts Followers/ Group D posts.
3. The above decisions will be implemented by CPMFs subject to the following conditions:-
i) The recruitment qualifications will not be lower than Matriculation ITI i.e. the lowest qualification prescribed by the 6th CPC for entry into Government Service.
ii) The functions of the various trades would be gone into and multi-skilling introduced. The additional posts to be created should take into account the impact of outsourcing (particularly in Static Formations) and multi-skilling; and
iii) The practice of deployment of Constables/ Followers at the residences of officers will be stopped forthwith and whereve
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to dismiss a petition based on delay and lack of merit, as well as the application of eligibility criteria under the Recruit....
The new Recruitment Rules apply to past recruitment processes, and petitions filed with significant delays may be dismissed for lack of merit.
A candidate's legitimate expectation for appointment should be honored based on the rules in effect during the recruitment process, despite later amendments altering eligibility criteria.
The court mandates timely framing of Recruitment Rules post-creation of new positions as per procedural guidelines, emphasizing compliance within three months.
A candidate has a right to be considered in light of existing rules, which implies “rule in force” as on date consideration takes place.
Administrative inaction by government bodies can result in significant prejudice to employees, necessitating timely actions to uphold employee rights.
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Rule 5(B) (3) and Rule 5(B) (5) of the Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937, which governed the classification and recruitment of posts wi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.