SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Rudra Prakash Trivedi - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12388 of 2022
Decided On : 09-09-2022




The court mandates timely framing of Recruitment Rules post-creation of new positions as per procedural guidelines, emphasizing compliance within three months.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Rules - Petitioners sought to quash orders declining promotion and directed the framing of Recruitment Rules for new posts in JAG Cadre of ITBP - The Office Memorandum dated 16.08.1993 mandates immediate action to frame rules for posts created - Delay in recruitment rules contravenes this directive. (Paras 1, 2, 3)

(B) Writ of Mandamus - Court directs respondents to finalize recruitment rules within three months and conduct DPC considering eligible officers thereafter. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought promotion to newly created posts in the JAG Cadre of ITBP based on the delay in notifying Recruitment Rules for these posts.

Findings of Court:
Respondent No.1 is directed to finalize the Recruitment Rules within three months.

Issues: Delayed recruitment rules and failure to promote eligible candidates as per entitlement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the obligation to adhere to established procedures for post creation and recruitment, asserting that timely action must be taken as mandated by guidelines.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek to quash promotion denial. (Para 1 , 1)
2. highlighting guidelines on recruitment rules. (Para 2)
3. court directs timely drafting of recruitment rules. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. petition disposed with directions. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By this petition, petitioners are seeking the following reliefs:

    "(a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned orders dated 02.11.2020 and 30.05.2022 vide which the Respondents declined to promote the Petitioners to the newly created posts of Second-In-Command in JAG Cadre of ITBP as per their entitlement based on ground that no Recruitment Rules pertaining to JAG Cadre of ITBP were available;

    (b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus thereby directing the Respondents to forthwith notify the Recruitments Rules for the newly created post of Second-in-Command in the JAG Cadre of ITBP and thereafter convene DPC in accordance with newly framed Recruitment Rules and if found fit; the Petitioners be promoted to the three vacant posts of Second- in Command with effect from the date vacancies were created thereby granting all the benefits to them as per their entitlement including pay and arrears and other such consequential benefits since 09.05.2019;"

2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for petitioner handed over an Office Memorandum dated 16.08.1993 issued by Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) and drew the attention of this Court to paras 1 and 4 of the same which are reproduced as under:

    "1. The undersigned is directed to say that the guidelines for framing of Recruitment Rules contained in this Department's OM No.AB 14017/12/87-Estt. (RR) dated 18.3.1988 provide, inter-alia, that as soon as a decision is taken to create a new post/Service or to upgrade any post or restructure any Service, action should be taken immediately by the administrative Ministry/Department concerned to frame Recruitment Rules therefor. The Recruitment Rules should be framed for all posts which are likely to last for one year or more. These guidelines further provide that Recruitment Rules for Group A & Group B posts/Services as approved by the administrative Ministry/Department should be referred to this Department first for clearance as early as possible and in any case not later than one month from the date of the creation of post/Service.

    4. In the light of the position stated above all the Ministries/Departments are requested to ensure that immediate action is initiated to frame Recruitment Rules after a post has been created and the draft Recruitment Rules for Group A & 9 posts should be finalised and referred to this Department for concurrence as early as possible and in any case within a period of one month from the date of creation of the post. Also, the total time take for finalisation of the Rules could in no case exceed three months."

3. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that 3rd Cadre Review took place for restructuring of Group 'A' service of Non-GD Cadres of the ITBPF duly approved and conveyed vide MHA letter dated 09.05.2019 where one new post of JAG/DIG and 03 new posts of 2IC were created. However, till date 03 posts of 2IC have not been filed-up by respondents despite the eligibility of the petitioners. Further submitted that the same is in contravention to the aforesaid Office Memorandum dated 16.08.1993.

4. On the last date of hearing, i.e. 26.08.2022, learned counsel for respondents, while accepting notice, had sought time to take instructions within how much time the recruitment rules would be framed.

5. However, today, learned counsel for respondents submits that draft rules have been forwarded to Ministry of Home Affairs, however, the same are pending for final decision.

6. In view thereof and considering the situation as it now stands, we hereby direct respondent No.1 to take final decision on the draft rules and frame the Recruitment Rules within three months from today. After framin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top