SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Sudhir Kumar Jain, JJ.
Md. Abdul Ahad Azim - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 6679 of 2022
Decided On : 27-04-2022




The new Recruitment Rules apply to past recruitment processes, and petitions filed with significant delays may be dismissed for lack of merit.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Rules, 2010 - The petitioner challenges the eligibility criteria for Group 'C' post recruitment after being initially selected for Group 'D' post - The Court addresses the applicability of new rules to past recruitment processes. (Paras 3-9)

(B) Delay in filing petition - The court considers the delay in applying for relief, ruling that the delay was not satisfactorily explained. (Paras 11-12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was selected in 2008 for Group 'D' post but faced disqualification under new rules implemented in 2010, which abolished Group 'D' positions. The initial recruitment process was cancelled with no appointments made.

Findings of Court:
The petition was dismissed due to lack of merit and delay in addressing the grievance.

Issues: The main issues were whether the new rules could affect past recruitment and the adequacy of the explanation for filing delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that the new recruitment rules are applicable, dismissing the petition on grounds of merit and delay, reinforcing the importance of compliance with the newly established criteria.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. court dismisses petition on merits and delay (Para 1 , 2 , 13)
2. eligibility criteria under recruitment rules 2010 (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. challenges regarding delays and withdrawals in petitions (Para 8 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 20280/2022 (exemption)

1. The application is allowed, with a direction to the applicant to file requisite certified copies/typed copies and annexures with proper margins within four weeks.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6679/2022

3. Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of impugned letter dated 30.08.2018 issued by the respondent authority declaring the petitioner ineligible for recruitment under the new Recruitment Rules, 2010 of Constable (Tradesmen) (Group `C' Post); directions to the respondents for issuance of the joining letter to the petitioner on the post of Follower Group 'D' post (Washermen) to which he was already selected in the recruitment process of October, 2008 which now stands merged with Group 'C' posts.

4. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was selected to the post of enrolled Follower (Group 'D' posts) (Washerman) in the recruitment process of October, 2008. Thereafter, vide order dated 29.10.2009 issued by Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India declared as under:

    "6th Pay Commission in its report vide recommendation in para 7.19.45 recommended that all the posts in CPMFs should be combatised like the position existing in the Defence Forces. The Commission, accordingly, recommended abolition of the cadre of Followers. The Commission further recommended that any further recruitment in the grade of Followers should cease immediately. The existing Followers should initially be placed in the -1S pay band (separately being recommended by the Commission for all Group D categories till the time they are re-deployed in the Group C posts). Proper training should be given to make them combatised and on successful completion of such training, they should be absorbed in the grade of combatant Constables against regular vacancies. The Commission finally recommended that all non essential jobs that can be done by outsiders without any operational problems but are presently being done by Followers, should henceforth be contracted out or outsourced. The above recommendation was accepted by the Government.

    2. Keeping in view the operation problems in outsourcing the jobs presently being done by the Followers, the proposal for continuation of the Cadre of Followers in CPMFs has been reconsidered by the Government and the following decisions have now been taken in the matter:-

    i) All posts of Followers/other Gr. D posts in CPMFs may be converted into Group C posts and be placed in PB-I with grade pay of Rs.2000/-.

    ii) After conversion of posts as proposed above the posts may be designated as Rifleman (name of trade) in case of Assam Rifles and Constable (name of trade) in case of other CPMFs, as for example Constable (Carpenter), Constable (Cook) etc.

    iii) RRs will be modified to make recruitment in each trade and for such posts will have no linkage with the RRs for the post of Constable/ General Duty and Constable/ Driver.

    iv) There will be no change in the total sanctioned strength of Battalion/ Company due to conversion of the posts of Followers in/as Gr. C posts.

    v) CPFs will submit the proposals for sanctioning of posts in the grade of Constable (Name of trade) against the posts which had been excluded earlier, while sanctioning other posts, on account of the recommendations of the 6th CPC for the abolition of the posts Followers/ Group D posts.

    3. The above decisions will be implemented by CPMFs subject to the following conditions:-

    i) The recruitment qualifications will not be lower than Matriculation ITI i.e. the lowest qualification prescribed by the 6th CPC for entry into Government Service.

    ii) The functions of the various trades would be gone into and multi-skilling introduced. The add

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top