SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1682

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Afroz Alam - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail Application No. 4335 of 2021
Decided On : 11-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
Naveen R. Nath, Advocate, Anirudh Bhat, Advocate, Amjad Khan, Advocate, Arijit, Advocate, Vikas Tomal, Advocate, Alok Mahajan, Advocate, Amit Chadha, Advocate

The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS act and the application of Section 29 in denying bail, emphasizing the purpose of the NDPS act in curbing the menace of drug addiction.

Headnote:

NDPS - Bail Application - Section 22 and 29 of the NDPS act read with Section 63 and 65 of the Copyright act - NDPS Act Section 29 - Summary: The court discussed the petitioner's involvement in printing labels for psychotropic substances and the application of Section 29 of the NDPS act, emphasizing the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS act in denying bail. The court highlighted the purpose of the NDPS act in curbing the menace of drug addiction and the deleterious impact of narcotics drugs on society.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner seeks bail in a case involving offences under Section 22 and 29 of the NDPS act read with Section 63 and 65 of the Copyright act. The petitioner was involved in printing labels for psychotropic substances and was in touch with the main accused. The court analyzed the quantum of recovery and the telephonic conversation between the petitioner and the co-accused.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's involvement in printing labels for psychotropic substances and the recovery of substantial quantities of literature and boxes indicated his connection to the illegal activities. The court emphasized the application of Section 29 of the NDPS act and the rigours of Section 37 in denying bail.

Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's involvement in printing labels for psychotropic substances, his connection to the main accused, and the application of Section 29 of the NDPS act in the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of Section 29 of the NDPS act and the rigours of Section 37 in denying bail, considering the deleterious impact of narcotics drugs on society and the purpose of the NDPS act in curbing the menace of drug addiction.

Final Decision: The petition for bail was dismissed with the above observations, along with pending application(s), if any.

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. - The petitioner seeks bail in FIR No.218/2018 dated 29.08.2018 registered at Police Station Crime Branch for offences under Section 22 and 29 of the NDPS act read with Section 63 and 65 of the Copyright act.

2. Briefly stated, the facts leading to the instant case are as follows:-

    i. On 28.08.2018, at about 4.00 PM, a secret information was received at IGIS/Crime Branch, Dwarka stating that one person, namely Sunil Sharma, is involved in supply of Tramadol (a substance prohibited under the NDPS act) to North-East region along with his friends namely, Rajesh and Nagesh.

    ii. after necessary compliances, raid was conducted and three persons namely, Sunil Sharma, Rajesh Kumar Sharma and Nagesh Sharma were apprehended. It is stated that 46,656 Capsules of Spasmo Proyvon Plus which contains Tramadol were recovered from their possession and the instant case was registered.

    iii. During investigation, several persons were arrested. In his disclosure statement, one co-accused Vineet Garg @ Banti stated that Sunil Sharma was funding the business and he used to supply Buprenorphine injection. It was further disclosed that the said Buprenorphine injection was supplied after removing the labels and stickers and after pasting labels of standards companies so that they can be sold on higher prices. It was disclosed that these labels were procured through the Petitioner herein.

    iv. It is stated that the Petitioner was arrested on 24.09.2018. It is stated that during investigation he disclosed that co-accused Sunil Sharma contacted him in Jan/Feb 2018 for the first time and informed him that he is in the process of setting-up his own medicine manufacturing plant. It is stated that he informed the petitioner herein that the capsule of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus is in great demand among drug abusers because it contained a psychotropic substance Tramadol. Co-accused Sunil Sharma further informed that they were setting up entire setup for manufacturing Spasmo Proxyvon Plus capsules, but they lack printing/packaging material.

    v. It is stated that co-accused Sunil Sharma lured the petitioner herein on the pretext that he will give ten times more money than the normal rate if the petitioner herein gets ready to extend help. It is stated that the co-accused Sunil also provided nearly 50-60 thousand labels of standard companies like Logo-Gesis and Lupi-Gesic despite having knowledge about the use of the stickers for illegal and easy sale of medicines containing psychotropic substance, i.e. Buprenorphine, without taking any Purchase Order/valid documents from the co-accused Sunil Sharma.

    vi. It is stated that the petitioner was taken on two days PC remand and three bundles (containing 9000 Nos. of literature) of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus Literature and 31 boxes of Stemetil MD having printed details of abbott Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. were recovered from his office i.e. 2151/14, New Patel Nagar, Delhi. It is pertinent to mention that the Petitioner does not have a license to print literature of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus.

    vii. The petitioner further disclosed that these recovered literature and empty boxes of Stemetil MD are the left over part of the consignment of printed/packaging material supplied to the co-accused Sunil Sharma. The above mentioned details were taken into possession through seizure memo.

    viii. It is stated that the petitioner herein was well versed with the use of printed material provided by him and despite that he extended his help to this group and provided all kind of printed/packaging material in order to make easy money. It is stated that without his help, it was not possible for the accused persons to sell Tramadol the psychotropic substance.

    ix. On the analysis of CDR, it was revealed that co-accused Sunil Shama was in touch with co-accused persons Rajesh Kumar Sharma (7838168550, Total Call-17), Vijay Dubey (9425619797, Total Call-2), Vineet Garg (9917949049, Total Call-7) and afroz alam i.e. the petitioner herein (98112

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top