IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Jasmeet Singh, JJ.
Kusumraj Institute Of Teacher Training College & Anr. - Appellantss
Versus
National Council For Teacher Education & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 3023 of 2022, Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 8791, 9906 of 2022
Decided On : 09-03-2022
NOC - Education Regulations - The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the reexamination of the application for recognition by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) based on the petitioner's claim of obtaining a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from the affiliating university.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought writs to quash the impugned Regulation 5(3) of the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 and the refusal order issued by the Regional Director, ERC. The petitioner claimed to have obtained a NOC from the affiliating university.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the petition, quashed the rejection order, and directed the reexamination of the application for recognition by the NCTE based on the petitioner's claim of obtaining a NOC.
Issues: Challenge to NCTE regulations, refusal order, and processing of application for recognition.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's claim of obtaining a NOC and directed the reexamination of the application for recognition by the NCTE.
Final Decision: The court quashed the rejection order and directed the reexamination of the application for recognition by the NCTE based on the petitioner's claim of obtaining a NOC.
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Shakdher, J. - Notice in the writ petition was issued on 17.02.2022. Mr Shivam Singh, who appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2, in effect, National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), on that date had submitted that the writ petition be disposed of, in terms of the judgment dated 09.02.2022 rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.1669/2022, titled RR Teacher Training College vs. National Council for Teacher Education & anr.
2. although there is no representation on behalf of respondent no.3 i.e., Patliputra University, Patna, counsel for the petitioners agree that the matter can be disposed of, in accordance with the above-mentioned judgment.
2.1 To be noted, we are told that respondent no.3 has been served.
3. The substantive prayers made in the writ petition read as follows :
'(a) issue. an appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) including the writ of certiorari quashing and setting aside the impugned Regulation 5(3) of the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 to the extent it mandates and requires the Petitioners to submit No Objection Certificate issued by the concerned affiliating body and declaring the same as unconstitutional and ultra vires the NCTE, 1993 and articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India; and / or
(b) issue an appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) including the writ of certiorari quashing and setting aside the impugned refusal order dated 02.05.2016 issued by the Regional Director, ERC; and / or
(c) issue an appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) including the writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to process and decide the application of the Petitioners for grant of recognition of B.Ed. Course under Section 7(16) of NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 without any reference to the requirement of NOC.'
4. Mr amitesh Kumar, who appears on behalf of the petitioners, says that in view of the fact that the petitioner no.1/college was able to obtain a No-Objection Certificate [in short 'NOC'] from the affiliating university, the petitioners, for the moment, do not need to challenge Regulation 5(3) of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014. In other words, the relief sought in prayer clause (a) need not be pressed.
5. Furthermore, it is Mr Kumar's submission that having regard to the fact that the petitioner no.1/college has already obtained a NOC from the Registrar, Patliputra University, its application for recognition can be processed by respondent no. 2 i.e., Eastern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education [ERC] as per the extant Rules.
5.1. In this context, our attention has been drawn to the document appended on page 159 of the case file. The said document is a copy of the NOC dated 17.01.2022, said to have been issued to the petitioner no.1/college by the Registrar, Patliputra University, Patna.
5.2. Mr Singh says that, in view of the submission made by Mr Kumar on behalf of the petitioners, respondent no.2/ERC can reexamine the application of the petitioners and dispose of the same, in accordance with the established procedure.
6. Given the foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of, with the following directions:
(i) The order dated 02.05.2016, passed by respondent no.2/ERC, whereby the petitioner no.1's/college's application for recognition was rejected primarily on the ground that the petitioner no.1/college did not have a NOC issued to them by the affiliating body, shall stand quashed.
(ii) Respondent no. 2/ERC will consider afresh the application for recognition available with it, in the light of the fact that the petitioners claim that they obtained a NOC from the Registrar, Patliputra University on 17.01.2022.
(iii) a fresh order will be passed by respondent no.2/ERC qua the petitioner no.1's/college's application for recognition, within twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the NOC.
(iv) P
The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's claim of obtaining a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from the affiliating university, leading to the reexamination of the application for recogn....
The importance of obtaining a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from the affiliating body for recognition of educational institutions.
The requirement of a No Objection Certificate for recognition applications was found to be regulated and subject to the petitioner obtaining such a certificate, affirming procedural compliance.
The court ruled that an NOC from the concerned Authority is not a prerequisite for recognition of teacher education courses under the NCTE Act, promoting the principle of procedural fairness in admin....
The court emphasized the importance of the NOC obtained from the State Government of Rajasthan in the application for recognition, and quashed the requirement of NOC from the affiliating body.
The court ruled that obtaining a No Objection Certificate from the State Government allows reconsideration of petitioner's application for recognition, quashing previous rejection due to NOC requirem....
The legal principle established is that a petitioner, recognized as a university, is not required to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for recognition by the NCTE.
The requirement for a No Objection Certificate for recognition by the NCTE is rendered underscored upon the petitioner's recognition as a private university.
Recognition as a university negates the requirement for a No Objection Certificate for application submissions under the NCTE Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.