SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Khatu Shyam College - Appellant
Versus
National Council for Teacher Education - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8568 of 2019 & CM Appl. 5832 of 2022
Decided On : 22-02-2022




Recognition as a university negates the requirement for a No Objection Certificate for application submissions under the NCTE Act.

Headnote:(A) National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Regulation 5(3) of Recognition Norms and Procedure Regulations, 2014 - Petition challenging the requirement of No Objection Certificate (NOC) for a recognition application by a private university - Court finds that with the petitioner’s recognition as a university, the need for NOC is rendered inefficacious. (Paras 1, 3, 4, 5)

(B) Procedural fairness - The court directs the appropriate committee to re-examine the recognition application in light of the new university status, ensuring the decision is made expeditiously. (Paras 5.6, 6)

(C) The petition is disposed of, with the previous order set aside and the committee directed to act accordingly. (Paras 6.1-6.5).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, formerly requiring an NOC for recognition, transformed into a private university on 05.10.2018, seeking recognition for courses without needing an NOC.

Findings of Court:
Respondent’s requirement for an NOC is now irrelevant, and the application must be reassessed based on the new university status.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is required to obtain NOC post-recognition as a university.

Ratio Decidendi: The requirement for NOC is superseded by the recognition as a university; thus, the committee must reconsider the recognition application.

Result: Writ petition disposed of, and the impugned order set aside.

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

1. The substantive prayers made in the writ petition are as follows:

    "(a) Issue a writ of Certiorari and quash Regulation 5 [3] of National Council for Teacher Education [Recognition Norms and Procedure] Regulations, 2014 to the extent it requires the Petitioner to submit No Objection Certificate [NOC] issued by the concerned Affiliating Body as the same is ultra vires the NCTE Act, 1993 and Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India; and

    (b) Issue a writ of certiorari and quash the order dated 10.08.2016 passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently direct the said Respondent to decide the application of the Petitioner for grant of recognition for B.A.B.Ed/B.Sc.B.Ed course in accordance with law; "

2. Mr Sanjay Sharawat, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that the petitioner metamorphosed into a private university on 05.10.2018, and, thus, stands recognised by the State of Rajasthan.

3. Given this position, Mr Sharawat says that the petitioner is not required to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) under Regulation 5 (3) of the National Council for Teacher Education [Recognition Norms and Procedure] Regulations, 2014 [in short "2014 Regulations"].

3.1. In other words, it is Mr Sharawat's contention that the petitioner cannot obviously be put in a position where it issues an NOC to itself, having now been recognised as a private university.

3.2. Therefore, Mr Sharawat says that the petitioner can now straightaway approach the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) for recognition, which was not granted earlier because it did not have an NOC.

3.3. It is in this context that the petitioner in the writ petition had laid, inter alia, a challenge to the order dated 10.08.2016 passed by respondent no. 2 i.e., Northern Regional Committee, NCTE. Mr Sharawat says that the work of the Northern Regional Committee is now handled by the Western Regional Committee, insofar as the State of Rajasthan is concerned.

3.4. Thus, it is also Mr Sharawat's contention that prayer clause (a) in the writ petition need not be pressed.

4. On the previous date, we had asked Mr Shivam Singh to obtain instructions in the matter. Mr Singh has reverted with instructions.

4.1. It is Mr Singh's submission that he cannot but accept the fact that since the petitioner has been recognised as a University by the State of Rajasthan, the requirement for it to obtain an NOC has been rendered inefficacious in the petitioner's case.

5. Therefore, the only other issue, even according to Mr Singh, which arises for consideration of respondent no. 2 i.e., now Western Regional Committee, NCTE would be, whether or not the petitioner should be granted recognition.

5.1. We may note that the fact that the petitioner has been recognised as a University, is evident from the document appended as Annexure "A-2" to CM APPL. 5832/2022. This is a document, which establishes that the petitioner has been recognised as a University.

6. Therefore, we are of the opinion that respondent no. 2 i.e., Western Regional Committee, NCTE would have to re-examine the matter as to whether or not the petitioner should be accorded recognition.

6.1. Consequently, the impugned order dated 10.08.2016 is set aside.

6.2. Respondent no. 2/Western Regional Committee, NCTE will re-examine the matter afresh.

6.3. Respondent no. 2/Western Regional Committee, NCTE will be at liberty to call for additional information/documents from the petitioner in case it is deemed necessary.

6.4. Needless to add, since the issue now involved concerns recognition of the petitioner, respondent no. 2/Western Regional Committee, NCTE will act with due expedition.

6.5. The aforesaid exercise will be completed at the earliest, though not later than 12 weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of the judgement rendered today.

7. Parties will act based on the digitally signed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top